🔖 chore: number the legacy-decorator line 0.1.x, not 1.x
Nothing has been published, so a 1.0.0/2.0.0 split claimed a stability and a history that do not exist. Staying on 0.x says what is true: the API may still move. Under semver a breaking change is then a minor bump, which is exactly the relationship between the two lines — 0.1.x keeps legacy experimentalDecorators, 0.2.x moves to TC39 standard decorators. Branch renamed 1.x -> 0.1.x to match, along with its CI trigger and the maintenance-line notice in the README. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SAcqrz3FcadkYr3xG32CjK
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ name: CI
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches: [ main, develop, 1.x ]
|
||||
branches: [ main, develop, 0.1.x ]
|
||||
pull_request:
|
||||
branches: [ main, develop, 1.x ]
|
||||
branches: [ main, develop, 0.1.x ]
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
verify:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user