206e88ae856bf46161b649a3f18793f73cf336a0
10
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8f99335bae |
Give a luminosity below a hundredth of the Sun's two figures, so Proxima reads 0.0015 L☉ not 0.002
formatLuminosity printed three decimals from a thousandth to 1 L☉, which leaves one figure below
a hundredth.
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
fa52f6a818 |
Give an archive star's distance error as the error on the distance it is, not as a parallax range
formatDistance printed any error of a fifth or more as the range a parallax's error makes, d/(1+e) to d/(1−e). A star the ETL places from the Exoplanet Archive carries the mean of sy_disterr1 and 2 instead, which the archive defines as one-sided errors on sy_dist in parsecs, and many of those distances come from a lensing model with no parallax behind them. 129 of the 3 195 archive stars with an error were printed as ranges the archive does not give: KMT-2016-BLG-1836L as 5.8 to 9.2 kpc, where the archive publishes 7 100 +800 −2 400 pc, and AT2021ueyL as 664 pc to 2.4 kpc against 1 040 +740 −440. The card now tells formatDistance when the error is on the distance (source exoplanet-archive), and it keeps the ± at any size. Measured on the shipped catalogue: KMT-2016-BLG-1836L reads 7.1 ± 1.6 kpc, AT2021ueyL 1.0 ± 0.6 kpc, EPIC 201170410 134 ± 43 pc, KMT-2016-BLG-0212L 6.3 ± 1.3 kpc. The ETL keeps only the mean, so a lopsided interval such as KMT-2016-BLG-1836L's is shown symmetric; carrying both errors would take a second column in stars-meta.bin. The doc comments on formatDistance and on distanceError no longer say an archive distance is an inverted parallax. Controls, each failing its named test: the error on the distance read as a parallax's (2 of 790 failed), and the card not saying it is on the distance (1 of 790). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a81dd491ad |
Say which band each star was measured in, whose catalogue it is, and how sure its distance is
The readout named Hipparcos, Yale and Gliese while 378 775 of the 455 608 stars are described by Gaia DR3, printed one "Magnitude" for G and V alike, and gave every distance to the parsec. The band cannot be read off the star's source, which records whose position it has: 62 002 stars Gaia places keep HYG's V and B-V, and the 575 hosts renamed after their planets are Gaia's, in G. stars-meta.bin gains two byte columns, 14 to 16 bytes a star (6 378 512 to 7 289 728 bytes; gzip -9 2 804 049 to 3 110 991). One holds the magnitude's band (V 76 555 stars, G 378 744, none 309, whose magnitude is a stand-in), which colour the colour index is (B-V 75 203, BP-RP 376 703), and whether the distance is Gaia's parallax. The other holds the distance's relative error as its square root in 255ths: a step is 0.08 % of distance at 1 %, 0.35 % at 20 %, and 100 % is the top. encode, decode, BYTES_PER_STAR_META and the build.ts round trip cover both; no workflow reads the format. Where the errors come from: - Gaia rows keep the parallax_error their query already fetched: median 0.3 %, 90th percentile 1.2 %, at most 20 %, the query's own cut. - A HYG star at Gaia's distance takes the cross-match's parallax_over_error, and a star merged into a Gaia entry keeps that entry's error with its position. - The 3 067 Hipparcos stars that keep their Hipparcos distance, Rigel, Deneb and Alnilam among them, take e_plx from van Leeuwen's 2007 reduction: a new cached query of public.hipparcos_newreduction on the ESA archive, whose 117 955 rows HYG's distances invert. - The archive's stars take sy_disterr1/2 from pscomppars, in a query and cache file of their own so the composite rows already cached were not refetched. - 439 distances have no published error: 357 Gliese rows and 82 archive hosts. Of the errors, 392 786 are 1 % or less and are not printed; 61 156 print as "117 ± 12 pc" to the distance's own digits; 1 196 between 20 and 100 %, and 30 past it, print as the range the parallax gives, since a symmetric error in parallax is a lopsided one in distance. The star card (measured on the dev server) now reads, for example: - Rigel: 265 ± 23 pc, V 0.18, B-V -0.03, source HYG. - Deneb: 433 ± 60 pc. - Alnilam: "476 pc to 833 pc" (Hipparcos 1.65 ± 0.45 mas). - Gaia DR3 5612323414549657984: 111 ± 2 pc, G 4.63, BP-RP -0.15, source Gaia DR3. - Proxima Centauri: 1.30 pc, V 11.01, source "HYG, Gaia DR3 distance". - TRAPPIST-1: G 15.62, BP-RP 4.90, source Gaia DR3. - Kepler-186: V 15.14, source NASA Exoplanet Archive. The neighbourhood's subtitle reads "Gaia DR3 378,775 · HYG 73,556 · NASA Exoplanet Archive 3,277", counted by the catalogue describing each star. build.ts validateStars now fails a catalogue with more than 1 000 stars without a band (309 today) or without a distance error (439). Dropping G from the Gaia rows gave 379 040 without a band, and dropping their parallax_error gave 441 216 without an error; both runs failed. Decoding the catalogue in Node took a median 29 ms before and 24 ms after (nine runs each, within noise). In the app, five cold boots gave a 654-786 ms long task after the data landed and the HUD at 1.83-2.07 s. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5
|
0c5efec505 |
Measure the ring span along the plane the rings lie in
The span went to `distanceRings` as the target's straight-line distance from the Sun, but a ring of radius r passes within |r - p| of the view's centre, where p is how far out that centre is *along* the galactic plane. For a target above the plane the two differ by its height, so the band was centred on a radius no ring has — and `ringLabels` picks its bearing by comparing its own in-plane distance against the innermost ring, a comparison the new first ring quietly broke. Two comments and a constant, from the same review. A frame short of the survey edge gets its callout only when its last ring overshoots it: 245 pc does, 235 pc does not, which is now a test rather than a sentence. The ring count can reach 16, not 14, now that the span need not start at the Sun. And a ring label was measured as 135 px of star name when "50 pc" is a third of that, which rejected rungs a hand's breadth clear of the name: RING_LABEL_REACH_NDC, 0.23, is the widest of them — "1.5 kpc" with "Survey edge" under it. Three mutants, three caught. Measured again in the app: unchanged for a star in the plane (4 labels at 20 pc above it, 7 at 2 pc), and the rings now follow the plane for one 195 pc above it rather than ringing a place the grid does not reach. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016jxMkwA2rbicdGxHosecYi |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5
|
7fba48c808 |
Answer the review: size the rings to the band the frame covers, and clear the text
The rings are centred on the Sun and the frame need not be. Sizing their step from how far the frame reaches — 210 pc for a star at 190 with the camera 20 pc back — gives 20 pc rings at 180 and 200, both outside a frame 19 pc deep, so a view away from the Sun still had no ring on it and no ladder of labels either. `distanceRings` now takes the span the frame covers rather than its far edge, and the step is a fifth of that: 5 pc rings from 165 to 210 for the same view. Measured in the app, centred on a star 187 pc out in the galactic plane: 4 ring labels drawn 20 pc above the plane and 7 from 2 pc, against 1 and none before. The clearance was a radius around the anchor, and a label is a line of text hanging 135 px to one side of its anchor: at 0.065 NDC apart, past the radius, "50 pc" printed inside "Alpha Centauri". It is now tested against the span the name occupies, on the side it hangs, with the radius kept for the pair whose text runs the other way. Also from the review: the ladder in the clearance test was built at exactly the constant it tests, so 1057 of 2000 camera poses would have decided it by float round-trip error — the rungs now sit 0.02 either side of the rule. And two comments that were wrong: a frame one step short of the survey edge does get its callout, and CSS2DRenderer hides a label behind the camera rather than drawing it at the page edge. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016jxMkwA2rbicdGxHosecYi |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5
|
5dec528cee |
Size the distance rings by what the frame reaches, and keep their labels off the star names
From the review of #19. The rings are distances from the Sun, but their step was taken from `effectiveDistance`, which under the plan view means the extent of the frame rather than how far the camera is from the Sun. Centred on a star 200 pc out and flipped to 2D, the grid became rings of 2 to 20 pc: not one of them on screen. The step now comes from where the view is centred plus how far the camera is orbiting it, which is the same distance under either projection. The set was also rebuilt while the grid was hidden, and every rebuild disposes the rings and builds every vertex again; it now happens only while the grid is drawn. The ring labels went straight to the overlay: never culled to the frame, and free to land on a star's name. They now have to be on screen and clear of the names already placed, by half the separation two names keep — they are a ladder up one ray a twentieth of the screen apart, and holding them apart from each other would take "Survey edge" off the map. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016jxMkwA2rbicdGxHosecYi |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5
|
43b9b1f081 |
Give the map a scale bar, and rings that say how far from the Sun
The map had one way to read a distance: the Range readout, a number for how far back the camera is. The local grid's five rings sat at 50 to 250 pc, fixed and unlabelled. They said nothing from inside a 2 pc hop, and nothing past 250 pc now that the Hipparcos stars Gaia places there are drawn. A scale bar now sits under the scale rail. It shows the longest round length (1, 2 or 5 x 10^n) that fits in 120 px, in AU inside a system and in parsecs or kiloparsecs outside. It is measured at the depth the view is centred on, since under perspective every depth has its own scale; under the plan view it is exact everywhere. The local grid's rings are now distances from the Sun, at a round step of about a fifth of the camera's distance and out past the camera: 50 to 350 pc from the opening view, 2 to 20 pc from twenty parsecs out. Each ring is labelled with its distance, on the side facing what the view is centred on, or across the far side of the grid when that is the Sun (the near side is under the camera and out of frame). The survey edge at 250 pc stays called out, as "Survey edge", whatever the step. The rounding lives in one place, scale-bar.ts, shared by the bar and the rings and tested there. Its formatter keeps three significant digits: one digit, enough for the bar's round lengths, printed the 250 pc ring as "300 pc". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016jxMkwA2rbicdGxHosecYi |
||
|
Claude
|
b14ce78c5f |
Say what formatRadiusKm actually returns
Its doc comment promised a fallback to Earth radii that the function has never had. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WaySiNst4HhDXBHnMy8p5G |
||
|
Claude
|
7b0f32f71a |
Assemble a body's readouts once, not once per panel
Follow-up to review on #3. The card and the detail page each built their own Measured/Derived split, kind label and provenance sentence — the drift buildBodyViewModel exists to prevent, re-forked one layer up, and the drift would have been in which side of the measured/derived line a quantity falls on, which is the distinction those panels exist to draw. One bodyReadouts(body) now returns both blocks and the sentence, and both templates iterate it. The two surfaces render identical rows as a result, and the card gains the inclination the detail page already showed. Also from that review: - KIND_LABELS was duplicated between the two panels; it now lives beside bodyReadouts. The third copy the review pointed at is a different union (search results are star/body/exoplanet, and label a body "Body"), so it stays where it is. - CardRow was HudReadout renamed. Both are now Readout, which HudReadout extends with its derived flag. - The enterable-systems count was a 21-line lazy memo over arrays that are already in hand; it is one expression where those arrays are assigned. - buildBodyViewModel now carries hostStarId, so the detail scene stops rescanning both catalogues for something the builder had already resolved. - heliocentricPeriodDays was called twice for the same body. - The superscript helper was a split/map/join; it is a replace. - info-panel had five computed() each wrapping one pure call with a non-null assertion, beside a template that inlined the same kind of call directly. They are gone with the shared readouts. - Dropped a tautological test that compared a pure function to itself. Replaced with one that asserts the host star id the builder now carries. - Removed the orphaned doc comment left behind when formatParsecs/formatAu moved out. And one the review raised as out of scope but is worth taking: formatRadiusKm grouped thousands above its decimal threshold and not below it, so 69,911 km sat beside a bare 6371 km. Both are grouped now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WaySiNst4HhDXBHnMy8p5G |
||
|
Claude
|
1019727a39 |
Say what is known about a world, and how it is known
Four changes to the readout panel and the body cards, which between them were showing less than the catalogues hold and not always distinguishing a measurement from an inference. Picking a planet used to navigate straight to /body/:id. That tore down the system scene and the camera with it, so comparing two planets meant flying back into the system between each. Hovering a body now raises a card over the live view and clicking pins it; Full view still opens the route for the full 3D inspection. Clicking empty space unpins, and leaving the system clears it. The card and the detail page were assembling "what do we know about this world" independently, which is the shape of bug where a planet reads 255 K in one panel and 254 K in the other. Both now build from one shared view model. Orbital period was absent everywhere. For a heliocentric orbit it follows exactly from the semi-major axis, because in these units the Sun's mass is the unit of mass — Mars comes back 687.0 d against a published 686.98. It is deliberately not computed for moons, whose elements are relative to a parent planet the catalogue has no mass for, nor for exoplanets: periodDays is populated for none of the 6319 shipped records and hostStarMassSolar for none either, so any figure would assume a solar-mass host and mis-state every planet around an M dwarf. Where a period does exist it is filed under Measured or Derived according to which it is, not by its field name. The system readout showed a flat 0.00 pc for the Sun's distance, which is arithmetically right and reads as a bug — the distance from here to here is not a measurement, so it is suppressed. It gains the host star's luminosity, marked as derived, and counts moons separately from planets. The neighbourhood readout gains the one thing the star field cannot show: how many of those points can actually be entered. Derived readouts carry a marker and a footnote saying so. Every quantity now formats through one module whose precision follows magnitude, rather than a fixed decimal count per call site that read as false precision at one end and lost real information at the other: 0.0026 AU stays legible instead of rounding to 0.00, and Pluto's period reads 248 yr rather than 90560 d. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WaySiNst4HhDXBHnMy8p5G |