6a45c914ac7c85a0ccc63387d7c2ea82c9a517a0
218
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
6a45c914ac |
Say a derived radius came from the star's type where no colour went into its temperature
The card said every derived radius came "from colour and brightness". Since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c0ed91dcf9 |
Pin three rules the suite passed without: the first planet's temperature, the one-step error floor, and G carried to V by type
publishedTemperaturesK keeps each host's first st_teff so the star field tints it as starSurfaceOf
draws its disc; the only test used Proxima, with one planet, and letting the last row win passed
all 828 tests while 189 hosts in the catalogue would be tinted apart from their disc (193 hosts give
their planets differing st_teff, 30 by more than 200 K). The new test gives one host three rows,
none, 4 094 and 3 640 K, and asks both functions for the same 4 094.
The error column's at-least-one-step floor was tested with an error of 1e-6, which at 255 steps
rounded to none but at f31ffe1's 65 535 rounds to 66, so dropping the floor passed. The fixture is
now 1e-12, 0.07 of a step.
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ee168996f7 |
Test the disc's limb law by working it out, and the phone framing through the scene
The disc test walked the material's node graph and asserted only that the constant 0.6 was in it,
so any law that kept the literal passed: a limb 1.6 times brighter than the centre, a reversed mu,
mu held at 1, all 828 tests green. It now evaluates the factor the photograph is multiplied by off
the graph itself, at a given cosine between normal and line of sight, knowing only +, -, *, clamp,
dot, oneMinus and negate and failing on anything else, and asks for the Sun's linear law: 1 at the
centre, 0.7 at mu 0.5, 0.4 at the limb and 0.4 past the silhouette. The dot must be of normalView
and positionViewDirection.
The phone framing (
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4c1e19d635 |
Give the disc sizes the framing quotes as radii, and the meta columns in the order they are stored
The framing rule works in radii: at 390x844 a giant's disc may take 0.74 - 90/195 = 0.278 of the 195 px half-side, 54 px from the centre, and before |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
280159dcd2 |
Bring the figures the comments quote back to what the catalogue now holds
Later commits on this branch ( |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f31ffe1425 |
Store a star's distance error in two bytes, so the card prints the error its catalogue published
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4d47896b4a |
Find the naked-eye stars Gaia's HIP cross-match lacks by position, and give two unnamed ones back their names
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
030447b83c |
Fold a Gliese star into the Gaia source SIMBAD names it as, so none is drawn twice or inside 10 pc by mistake
HYG's Gliese-only rows, with no Hipparcos astrometry and no published error on their distance, reach the merge with positions off by up to minutes of arc, photometric distances and sometimes wrong proper motions, and isSameStar's geometry missed 49 of them beside their own Gaia entry. 43 lie within 25 pc and 27 are fainter than V 12, the layer the brief asked to merge without duplicates. GJ 3478 is 16.3" from its Gaia entry, past the 15" tolerance; GJ 2097 moves 39 % differently by HYG's motion; GJ 4285 is co-moving but 1.6 magnitudes brighter in HYG's V than Gaia's G. Two of them were false stars inside 10 pc: GJ 2097 at 6.41 pc and GJ 4285 at 6.80, which Gaia measures at 24.47 and 28.25. HYG also put Gl 94 31.6 degrees from where it is, and HD 23585 and HD 23713, Pleiades members at 135 pc, at 20.6 and 22.2. 0e9ab6f's "no Gliese row within 25 pc has a co-moving bare Gaia entry 3-300" away" held only under its own motion rule. fetchStars now asks SIMBAD once, in one cached TAP query, for the Gaia DR3 designation of every object it knows by a GJ number (4 868), maps HYG's `gl` column onto it, and foldByIdentity folds each Gliese-only row into the bare Gaia entry of that source: HYG's name, type and photometry, Gaia's position and distance, as combine does for any other pair. An ETL run from cache folds 49: 455 571 stars become 455 522, the stars within 10 pc 369 become 367, within 25 pc 5 522 become 5 479, HYG rows without a Gaia counterpart 11 517 become 11 468, distances with no published error 395 become 346. exoplanets.json is unchanged. In the running app GJ 2097 reads "24 pc, HYG, Gaia DR3 distance", GJ 4285 28 pc, Gl 94 17 pc, and 367 stars lie within 10 pc. validateMerge now refuses any Gliese-only row beside the bare Gaia entry SIMBAD names as the same star. Controls: folding with an empty identity map fails the ETL with "49 Gliese stars are drawn beside the Gaia source SIMBAD names them as, starting with GJ 1033" (the baseline passed); in the unit suite, folding a row with a Hipparcos error fails "leaves a star with a Hipparcos error, and a Gaia entry already folded into, alone", and keeping the Gliese position fails "folds a Gliese entry into the Gaia entry SIMBAD names it as, at Gaia's position and distance". HYG's V is kept for a folded star, which for GJ 3207 is the wrong one (11.51 where SIMBAD has 13.75). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8d59c720b3 |
Hold the published catalogue to its naked-eye stars, its host luminosities and five other things no check saw
Seven properties of the catalogue could be lost by a one-line slip in the ETL with every validator passing and the weekly job publishing the result. validateStars and validateExoplanets now refuse: - fewer than 8 800 stars of V 6.5 or brighter (8 886 measured), or Rigel, Deneb or Alnilam gone; with no magnitude handed to placementDistancePc, 7 378 are left; - a host luminosity that is not positive, or fewer than 90 % of planets carrying one (6 036 of 6 354): st_lum is published as log10(L/L_sun), and stored unconverted 3 307 read <= 0 and Proxima's -2.82; - fewer than 40 colours marked as read off a temperature (54 measured); - an archive-placed star more than 1 mas from its planets' published position carried from J2015.5 to J2000 (6.6e-8 mas at most measured; not carried, 6 277.9); - fewer than 300 HYG stars folded into Gaia keeping their more precise Hipparcos distance (384), or Tarazed and Eta Leo off theirs; - more than 5 archive stars numbered other than their name hashes to (1 measured). These come from an interrupted earlier attempt left uncommitted in this worktree; its other half, asymmetric archive distance errors that nothing in the ETL wrote, and a placementDistancePc test that failed, was discarded (saved in the scratchpad as uncommitted-at-start.patch). The naked-eye check is new, and runs before the Hipparcos one, which the same slip also trips. Controls, each an ETL run from cache in a throwaway worktree that reached "Validating output..." and failed with the named check's own message: no magnitude to placementDistancePc (naked-eye floor); `10 ** logLuminosity` -> `logLuminosity`; colorFromTemperature never set; the archive epoch offset times 0; combine never taking the other entry's distance; archive ids in arrival order. The unmutated baseline passed. star.model.ts's count of flagged hosts, 57, is now 54. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5fb0d45623 |
Place an archive host by its parallax where the archive gives no distance, so mu2 Sco b has its star
The archive leaves sy_dist blank for mu2 Sco and publishes sy_plx 6.31 +- 0.86 mas. The matcher only reads the parallax as a second chance beside a finite sy_dist, and the archive-star fallback needs sy_dist too, so mu2 Sco b had no host while Pipirima (HIP 82545, V 3.56, B2 IV) sat on the map 0.4" from the archive's direction at 145.3 pc. The build.ts comment and the step report said the 27 hostless planets had "no distance in either archive table"; mu2 Sco was the one whose row has a parallax. archiveDistancePc takes sy_dist, or 1000 / sy_plx where it is blank (158.5 pc here, within the ratio test of Pipirima's 145.3). An ETL run from cache changes exoplanets.json alone: mu2 Sco b now has host 82294, Pipirima, and 6 328 of 6 354 planets have a host (26 without, none of whose rows has a distance or a parallax). hostDistancePc stays the archive's own blank. Control: ignoring the parallax fails "takes the archive's parallax where it gives no distance, and nothing from a parallax that is none" alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
734b048c9e |
Write the star assets once, after the archive's hosts are added, not before them as well
Since |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
073fb9f718 |
Ring only the planet hosts inside the survey edge, so the Kepler field is not a band over the view
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e62e2fb03f |
Keep a giant's disc clear of its neighbours' names on a phone, not only on a desktop
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4e7d4cd1d6 |
Say a type estimated from a colour read off the archive's temperature came from the temperature
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2dac3767e8 |
List a host's own planets ahead of the systems whose names only run on from its own
Once the archive's 3 277 hosts became stars and 574 Gaia hosts took their names, "K2-18" listed the star K2-18 and then K2-180 to K2-186, and no planet: "k2-18 b" and "k2-180" were both prefix matches, and on a tie the ranking put every star before every exoplanet. Replaying each host's name through the ranking over the published catalogue, 325 hosts had some of their own planets pushed out of the eight rows shown (655 planet rows), against 75 before the archive stars. A prefix match that ends where a word does now scores 3.5, between an exact match and a prefix running on into the same word. The same replay gives 50 hosts and 62 rows. In the running app "K2-18" lists K2-18, K2-18 b, K2-18 c, then K2-180 onward; "Kepler-186" lists the star and Kepler-186 b to f before Kepler-1860; Kepler-22 b and WASP-12 b are back. "Proxima", "Io" and "TRAPPIST-1" list as before. Control: scoring the word-ending prefix level with any prefix fails "lists a host's own planets ahead of the systems whose names run on from its own" alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f8582b78d0 |
Test the star's disc itself: its photograph, its colour and its darkening toward the limb
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
368fcfb6f0 |
Keep each spectral type's giant surface once, rather than reparse it for every star at boot
The star field reads every star's temperature at boot, and each read asked giantSurface, which
splits the type and runs two regular expressions whether or not the star is a giant: 455 571
times for 2 888 distinct type strings. It depends on the type alone, so it is now kept per type.
The tint pass over the published catalogue gives the same colours (checksum 5 830 745.929 before
and after) and in Node takes 167-237 ms against 241-305. In the running app, the star field
rebuilt in the page three times after each of four cold boots: median 65 ms before (60-79), 51
and 53 ms after in two runs (46-67). The longest task after the data lands did not move beyond
the noise (median 851 ms before, 859 and 827 after): most of the boot growth since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
17cf11b6b1 |
Tint a planet host in the star field at the archive's temperature, which its disc is drawn at
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
aafc788352 |
Hold van Belle's giant temperatures at 3 134 K from M6, as its table does, and test every piece
giantSurface carried the 64-71.5 fit of van Belle et al. (2021, ApJ 922, 163, table 8) on to index 73.9, where the table's fourth piece, 72-74, is flat at 3 134 K: M6 III (index 72) came out 3 300 K and M7 III 3 214 K. The paper's own M6 and M7 giants average 3 112 and 3 114 K. The temperature and the correction at it both feed the drawn radius, so the 29 catalogue giants from M6 to M7.9 were drawn too small: Rho-2 Ari 57.1 solar radii, now 81.5; 30 Her 88.3, now 126.0; Eps Oct 64.9, now 92.6. The comment said the scale was held "past M7.75"; it now says from M6. The giant test only reached the third piece (Aldebaran K5 III, Antares M1). It now checks each piece against table 8: G8 III 4 797.08 K, K2 III 4 387.58, M5.5 III 3 343.43, and M6 and M7 III at 3 134. Controls, each failing "reads a giant's temperature and correction both off its type" alone: the third piece carried past M6 again; a G giant indexed as K; the first piece's slope 52.74 -> 45; the second's 199.41 -> 180. Before this, the last three left all 817 tests passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
206e88ae85 |
Read a dwarf with a type and no colour at its type's row of the dwarf sequence
A non-giant with a spectral type but no colour took its temperature off the textbook colour spectralTypeToColorIndex gives its type, read on Pecaut & Mamajek's table, and its bolometric correction off the old textbook anchors. The table puts those colours elsewhere: M8's B-V 1.88 is M5-M5.5 there, 3 001 K where M8 V is 2 570, and the anchors give M8 -3.92 where the table has -5.65. GJ 3655 (M8, 14.35 pc) was drawn at 0.035 solar radii, a third of Jupiter, where its type's row gives 0.106 (Mamajek's M8 V: 0.114). Every O type came out B0's 31 400 K. Both now read dwarfSequenceAtType, which already existed for the giants, and a G magnitude is carried to V at the type's G-V too. On the published catalogue, of the 835 non-giant stars with a band, a type and no colour, those more than 200 K off their type's row go from 21 to 0, those with a radius more than 1.5 times off it from 7 to 1 and a luminosity from 10 to 1 (the one left, Oph 11, is a G-band star). GJ 3849 (dM9) goes from 0.030 to 0.089 solar radii, GJ 3855 (M6.5) from 0.040 to 0.087. Two tests pinned the textbook path and now read the table: M5Ve with no colour is 3 060 K, not 3 106, and K5 tints as B-V 1.15, its row, not 1.105. An O8 star is 35 100 K, its row, not B0's. Controls: reading the temperature through the textbook colour again fails "is drawn at its type's row of the dwarf sequence" (with the three updated tests); reading the correction off the anchors again fails that test alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
89c2568018 |
Describe the star at a system's centre as it is drawn now, not by the innermost-orbit rule and its halo
The README still said the star was sized against its innermost orbit and made visible by a halo, two things |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a70a7290f3 |
Test that the host matcher carries an archive row back from J2015.5, where the constant only was
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
69a052730f |
Test that the system view warms a host's planets by the luminosity the archive gives it
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
15b8f2dff3 |
Say which stars sit at the Gliese catalogue's distances, about half of them no parallax at all
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5ab4c5df89 |
Say a planet has no temperature because its star's luminosity or its orbit is unknown, not its star
The card and the body page said "Its host star is not in the catalogue" for every planet without
an equilibrium temperature. Over the shipped data that is 2 714 planets, and the host really is
missing for 27. 2 420 have no semi-major axis, and since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8f99335bae |
Give a luminosity below a hundredth of the Sun's two figures, so Proxima reads 0.0015 L☉ not 0.002
formatLuminosity printed three decimals from a thousandth to 1 L☉, which leaves one figure below
a hundredth.
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
95ffb009a2 |
Tint each star in the field the colour its own disc is drawn in, a blackbody at its temperature
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a8f394cf57 |
Read a giant's temperature off its type as well as its correction, so a radius has one source
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
06b4ff64b5 |
Read a white dwarf past the table's blue end at the temperature white dwarfs of its colour have
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
18faa6d0b2 |
Classify a star for the rows that list it, not every star each time the index is built
The search index and the route index gave every one of the 455 571 stars a subtitle up front through spectralClassification, which filtered the dwarf table afresh on each call; the star field's tints read the same table once per BP−RP star. Both indices now carry the star itself and classify it only for the rows shown (entrySubtitle): eight search results, a few route options. The two filtered columns of the table are built once. Node, over the shipped catalogue, five runs: classifying every star 121-167 ms before, 56-62 after hoisting the table alone; reading the sequence at every BP−RP colour 187-216 ms, now 111-127. In the app on :4302, two cold loads each, the long task when the Search tab opens was 264-380 ms (median 280) before and 164-276 ms (median 171) after; the longest boot task 863 and 875 ms before, 654 and 741 after. Tests: the search spec checks its index holds no classification and the row still reads "Star · ~M8"; the scene spec now reads the route options, and checks its index holds none either. Controls: classifying every star in the search index, doing so in the route index, and route options printing the index's subtitle each fail the named test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ff744a00de |
Place a naked-eye star HYG gives no distance for by its Hipparcos parallax, where that is 2.5 times its error
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8c3a86097c |
Place a star at whichever of its two distances is the more precise, not at Gaia's regardless
placementDistancePc took Gaia's distance wherever the cross-match gave a usable one, and its
docstring and
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
23547defe0 |
Read an archive host's colour off the dwarf sequence at its temperature, and say it was not measured
For an archive-placed host with a temperature and no B magnitude, fetchExoplanets took B−V from Ballesteros' blackbody fit, which runs 0.1 to 0.2 redder than Pecaut & Mamajek's dwarf sequence below 3 800 K, and the luminosity then read its correction off that sequence at that colour: 3 500 K came back as 3 102 K with a correction 1.15 magnitudes too large, anything under about 3 170 K was clamped to B−V 2.00, and the card printed it as a measured "Colour B−V 2.00". CFBDSIR J145829+101343, a 580 K brown dwarf, read "Spectral type ~M6, from colour". temperatureToColorIndex now reads the table itself backwards, interpolating B−V between the two types the temperature falls between, so the temperature and correction read back off the colour are the table's at that temperature; it has no answer outside 2 420 to 31 400 K. The colour is flagged colorFromTemperature, a fifth bit in the photometry byte (the format, README and the ETL's round-trip check follow), and the card prints it "B−V 1.66, from its temperature", marked derived. From cache: 57 archive stars change colour; 54 carry the flag and 3, CFBDSIR J145829+101343 among them, now have none. For the 47 of them the archive gives a luminosity, the one derived from magnitude and colour moves from a median 0.228 dex off it to 0.124; Kepler-445 (3 157 K) from 0.0282 L☉ to 0.0080 against the archive's 0.0079. Its colour goes from 2.00 to 1.67. The card shows the archive's luminosity where it has one since earlier on this branch, so this is the figure used for the rest and for their radii. Controls, each failing its named test: the nearest hotter row taken without interpolating (2 of 803 failed), no refusal outside the table, the flag not encoded, and the card calling the colour measured (1 of 803 each). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f82b5e1c74 |
Hold the published catalogue to what its host radii, distance errors and Gaia-distance flags come to
Three things the branch added could vanish from the data with every check passing, as the review
showed with guarded ETL mutants: dropping st_rad or st_teff from each planet left 0 of 6 354
carrying their host's radius or temperature, storing Gaia's parallax_error in milliarcseconds
rather than over the parallax changed 431 464 distance readouts, and dropping the flag fetchStars
sets relabelled 8 129 HYG stars placed at Gaia's distance "HYG". The round trip compares decoded
with encoded, and the counts of missing bands and errors do not look at what the values are.
validateExoplanets now requires 90 % of planets to carry their host's radius and temperature
(measured 6 030 and 6 054 of 6 354). validateStars requires the median relative error of the
distances at Gaia's to be under 1 % (measured 0.33 %), at most 1 % of stars to have a parallax
distance with an error of a fifth or more (measured 1 109, 0.24 %; the archive's, which are on the
distance and never ranged, are left out), and at least 6 000 HYG stars flagged at Gaia's distance
(measured 8 129). Figures from an ETL run from cache on this branch.
Each proved by a guarded mutant in a scratch copy of the ETL, run from the cache, failing with its
own message: host radius dropped ("Only 0 of 6354 exoplanets carry their host's radius and 6054 its
temperature"), host temperature dropped ("6030 ... and 0"), the Gaia error left in mas ("The median
error of Gaia's distances is 1.92 %"), the same with the median check waived ("17689 parallax
distances have an error of a fifth or more"), and the flag dropped ("Only 0 HYG stars are flagged
at Gaia's distance"); a no-op edit completed. No ceiling is loosened.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
6d81c45f45 |
Carry the archive's positions back from Gaia DR2's J2015.5, where it publishes them, not J2016
fetchExoplanets placed each star it adds from the Exoplanet Archive by carrying the archive's
position back sixteen years, and
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
62f81f2c43 |
Number the stars the archive places after their host's name, so a refresh keeps each one's id
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
1a8e734651 |
Leave the dark nebulae out of the backdrop, whose sprites can only add light
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
0e9ab6ffb5 |
Fold the Gliese entries that move with a Gaia star up to 160″ away, where a minute left 39 twice
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
150ec76bbd |
Say that a host's radius, temperature and luminosity come from the composite table alone
The comment on hostStarRadiusSolar and its two neighbours said they were read from "the planet's default row first, then the composite table". The default-row query (TAP_COLUMNS in fetchExoplanets.ts) asks for none of st_rad, st_teff or st_lum — the cached answer's columns end at st_mass and disc_year — so host() always reads them from pscomppars, whose columns may each cite a different reference: Proxima's 0.141 R☉ is the composite table's. It also said they were measured where stellar.ts derives a luminosity, which held for the luminosity only once starSurfaceOf began reading st_lum, earlier on this branch; it now points at starSurfaceOf. A comment, so there is no test to fail. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4ebe663a84 |
Carry the Hipparcos parallax errors between weekly refreshes, as the Gaia answers already are
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
08bf8b18a6 |
Test that a Gaia star with no measured band is still labelled Gaia's
describingCatalogue calls a star Gaia's when its source is gaia and its band is not V. 44 Gaia sources in the shipped catalogue have no G (Gaia DR3 40091256260676736 among them), and nothing tested them: narrowing the rule to band G, which would relabel all 44 "HYG" and count them as HYG in the neighbourhood census, passed the suite. The existing test already builds such a star and now checks its Source row as well. Control: the rule narrowed to band G fails "says a stand-in magnitude was not measured, and leaves out a colour there is none of" (1 of 797). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f8af0ecf6e |
List stars in search and routes by the type their colour gives them, and say where archive positions come from
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4191b70e63 |
Tint a star measured in Gaia's BP−RP as the B−V of the dwarf of that colour
colorIndexToRgb maps a B−V onto the star field's tint ramp, and its one caller passed it every star's colour index, whatever colorSystem said. BP−RP is the larger of the two for the same star — 0.823 against 0.65 for a G2 dwarf, 1.84 against 1.42 for an M0 (Pecaut & Mamajek) — so the 376 703 stars measured in it, 83 % of the catalogue, were tinted as later types than they are, and redder than HYG's stars of the same type, and than their own disc in the system view. A BP−RP is now carried to the B−V of the dwarf sequence at that colour (the table's own B−V column, which DwarfSequencePoint now returns, clamped at its ends), then tinted as before. The median Gaia colour, BP−RP 0.883, a G7 dwarf, read as a K2: its tint goes from (1, 0.972, 0.955) to (0.975, 0.982, 1), the same as HYG's G7 stars. Controls, each failing its named test: BP−RP read as B−V (2 of 792 failed), the star field not passing the colour system (1 of 792), and the B−V taken from the wrong column (3 of 792). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
fa52f6a818 |
Give an archive star's distance error as the error on the distance it is, not as a parallax range
formatDistance printed any error of a fifth or more as the range a parallax's error makes, d/(1+e) to d/(1−e). A star the ETL places from the Exoplanet Archive carries the mean of sy_disterr1 and 2 instead, which the archive defines as one-sided errors on sy_dist in parsecs, and many of those distances come from a lensing model with no parallax behind them. 129 of the 3 195 archive stars with an error were printed as ranges the archive does not give: KMT-2016-BLG-1836L as 5.8 to 9.2 kpc, where the archive publishes 7 100 +800 −2 400 pc, and AT2021ueyL as 664 pc to 2.4 kpc against 1 040 +740 −440. The card now tells formatDistance when the error is on the distance (source exoplanet-archive), and it keeps the ± at any size. Measured on the shipped catalogue: KMT-2016-BLG-1836L reads 7.1 ± 1.6 kpc, AT2021ueyL 1.0 ± 0.6 kpc, EPIC 201170410 134 ± 43 pc, KMT-2016-BLG-0212L 6.3 ± 1.3 kpc. The ETL keeps only the mean, so a lopsided interval such as KMT-2016-BLG-1836L's is shown symmetric; carrying both errors would take a second column in stars-meta.bin. The doc comments on formatDistance and on distanceError no longer say an archive distance is an inverted parallax. Controls, each failing its named test: the error on the distance read as a parallax's (2 of 790 failed), and the card not saying it is on the distance (1 of 790). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d1aa22ed61 |
Frame a giant so its disc sits inside the ring its neighbours are named on
The system view names a star's neighbours on a ring at 0.74 of the view's tighter half-extent, whatever the star. A giant was framed to fill the frame, 2.4 radii out, which the three-radius closest approach then overrode, so it settled at 3 radii with its disc projecting to 0.758 of the half-extent: in the app, Betelgeuse's disc was 379 px on a 1 000 px view against the 370 px ring, and HD 39374 and HD 38118 were printed on it at about 1.3:1 contrast. The star's term in the framing distance now places its silhouette, asin(R / d), at half the tighter half-extent, which puts the camera 4.4 radii out on a 50° view. Measured on :4302 at 1600 by 1000: Betelgeuse settles at 13.9 AU (closest approach 9.5) with a 250 px disc and Antares at 14.1 AU; the nearest corner of any neighbour's name is 292 px from the centre, so none is on either disc (it was two and one of them before). Closing in to the closest approach can still bring the disc over the names; that is the viewer's choice, not the arrival's. This also gives the star's term a job: at 2.4 radii it never exceeded the closest approach, so dropping it changed nothing (the previous commit's one surviving control). Controls, each failing its named test: the star left out of the framing (1 of 788 failed), the star framed to fill the frame (2 of 788), and the disc taken as flat (1 of 788). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5aac46de08 |
Draw a star nothing gives a size or temperature for as a grey point, not as the Sun
The system view drew every star without a radius at the Sun's radius, and every star without a temperature in the Sun's colour. PSR J1719-1438, a neutron star 10 km across, came out 1 R☉ wide, wider than its planet's 0.0044 AU orbit, and b spent nine tenths of its orbit inside it; Procyon B, a white dwarf of 0.012 R☉ with a type the parser does not read and no colour, was a Sun 81 times too wide in the Sun's colour. Such a star is now drawn at 150 km, under the three-pixel floor from anywhere the camera can go, so the floor's point is what shows, and its disc keeps the photograph's own grey instead of the Sun's tint. Its light stays white, which is the photographs' own light rather than a claim about the star. 2 858 stars take this after the clamping in the previous commit, against 3 077 drawn at the Sun's radius before it. In the app on :4302: PSR J1719-1438's star is drawn at 1.7×10⁻⁴ AU (the floor, 168 times its geometry) with b 0.00417 AU from its centre, outside it; Gl 280B at the floor, tint (1, 1, 1) and no radius on its card; Proxima at 0.141 R☉, tint (1, 0.459, 0.135), light (1, 0.523, 0.165), card "Luminosity 0.002 L☉" unmarked and "Radius 0.141 solar radii". The scene's use of the star's surface had no test: every star in the scene spec was drawn at the Sun's radius, and drawing all of them so, lighting planets white, tinting every disc as the Sun or closing the camera to the Sun's clearance all passed. The spec now gives Proxima its planet's archive row and adds Antares and Procyon B, and three tests enter them. Controls, each failing its named test: every star at the Sun's radius (3 of 787 failed), an unmeasured one at it, the light without the temperature, the closest approach for the Sun, the Sun's tint for a host, the Sun's tint for a star without a temperature, and the card without the surface (1 of 787 each). Dropping the star from the framing distance was not caught: its term, 2.4 radii, never exceeds the three-radius closest approach the camera is clamped to, so it cannot change where the camera settles. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
31e0c04fe1 |
Read a colour past either end of the dwarf table at that end, where the star has no type instead
dwarfSequenceAtColor answers null outside Pecaut & Mamajek's table, B−V −0.301 to 2.16 and BP−RP −0.12 to 5.1, and effectiveTemperatureK then fell back on the type, which Gaia's stars do not have and carbon stars' parser does not read. 219 stars with a measured colour got no temperature and so no radius, and were drawn at the Sun's radius in the Sun's colour: 110 white dwarfs within 50 pc, 38 Gaia stars redder than BP−RP 5.1 (Gaia DR3 6439125097427143808, an ultracool dwarf 4.0 pc away), HD 46687, La Superba and the other carbon stars, and an O8 star. Past the table, the colour is now read at the row it is past (clampToTable), but only for a star with no readable type: beside a type an off-table colour is more often the bad measurement — HD 49748 is G5 V at B−V −0.32 — so the type still wins there, as it did. The luminosity reads the same point, so a star past the red end also gets the M8.5 row's G−V and correction. A type's own colour past the table, which only O types have, is read at B0. Carbon and S stars (C, N, R, S) now count as giants, so their correction stays their type's, not an M8.5 dwarf's −5.78. Measured on the shipped catalogue: stars without a temperature 3 053 -> 2 834, without a radius 3 077 -> 2 858; all 292 stars with an off-table colour now have a temperature, against 73. Gaia DR3 6439125097427143808 is 2 420 K and 0.110 R☉ (M8.5 V: 0.104); the 110 white dwarfs a median 0.018 R☉ at 10 700 K (0.0013 to 0.034); HD 46687 212 R☉ at 2 420 K and La Superba 133; audit #16's Gaia DR3 5612323414549657984, k1 Pup, B6 V at BP−RP −0.15, 203 L☉ and 4.1 R☉ against 143 and none (FLAME gives 336 and 3.49). The 2 851 stars left without a radius have neither a colour nor a readable type, or no band. Controls, each failing its named test: no clamp for an untyped star (2 of 784 failed), the clamp winning over a type, an O type's colour unclamped, the luminosity off the unclamped sequence, and carbon stars not counted as giants (1 of 784 each); clampToTable ignored (3 of 784). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d097f4b477 |
Correct a giant's light by its type, not by the cooler dwarf its colour reads as
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d94451e203 |
Warm a host's planets by the luminosity the archive publishes for it, not one derived beside it
The ETL has carried each host's st_lum since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
869635bec1 |
Give a star no survey measured no luminosity, so its planets get no temperature from a stand-in
luminosityOf derived a luminosity from any magnitude, including the stand-in the ETL writes for the 309 stars with neither a V nor a G. starSurfaceOf already refused it for the radius; the card, the system view's planet appearances and the body pages did not. The 265 archive hosts among them came out at a median 33 L☉: KMT-2016-BLG-1107L, a 0.087 M☉ star, at 36.8, and OGLE-2005-BLG-390L b, published at about 50 K, read 388 K and a sub-Neptune. Their cards printed "Magnitude: Not measured" beside a luminosity derived from that magnitude. The guard now sits in luminosityOf, which every caller goes through, so the one in starSurfaceOf is gone. The Sun keeps its 1 whatever band it is filed under. Measured on the shipped catalogue: of the 275 planets on those 265 hosts, 268 had an equilibrium temperature and 0 now do; before the archive stars were added they had no host, and so none either. Controls: without the guard, "has none from a magnitude no survey measured, and gives its planets no temperature from it" fails (with the radius test beside it, 2 of 777); without the Sun's exemption, "is 1 for the Sun, whatever its magnitude is filed under" fails (1 of 777). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |