Commit Graph
14 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 ff744a00de Place a naked-eye star HYG gives no distance for by its Hipparcos parallax, where that is 2.5 times its error
c64eea0 left out 41 naked-eye stars "because neither survey gives them a distance". Hipparcos does:
HYG's distances are 1 000 over van Leeuwen's 2007 parallaxes, which the ETL already downloads for
their errors, but HYG writes its 100 000 pc placeholder for every parallax under 1 mas whatever its
error, while keeping far less certain ones above it (Alnilam at 1.65 ± 0.45 mas is drawn). 30 of
the 41 have a positive parallax in the new reduction and 7 have one at least 2.5 times its error:
HD 74180 at 0.67 ± 0.16 mas (4.2 σ), Mu Cep at 0.55 ± 0.20.

hipparcosDistancePc (star-merge.ts, with HYG's placeholder constant moved beside it) keeps HYG's
distance and, where it gives the placeholder, takes 1 000 over the parallax when that is 2.5 times
its error; fetchHipparcosParallaxErrors now returns the parallax with its error. From cache the ETL
keeps 73 563 HYG rows against 73 556 and publishes 455 571 stars; the seven are Alp Cam (1.4 to 3.0
kpc), Psi-1 Aur, HD 74180 (1.2 to 2.0 kpc), HD 86352, HD 96918, Mu Cep (1.3 to 2.9 kpc) and HD
217476, each printed as the range its parallax's error gives. The other 34 stay out: no parallax,
or one within 2.5 times its error of zero. Parallax distances printed as ranges go from 1 109 to
1 116; the validators hold.

Controls, each failing its named test: placeholder rows given no distance, and any parallax 1.25
times its error placing a star (1 of 807 each).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:45:12 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 8c3a86097c Place a star at whichever of its two distances is the more precise, not at Gaia's regardless
placementDistancePc took Gaia's distance wherever the cross-match gave a usable one, and its
docstring and c64eea0 called that "the better measurement", adding that Gaia saturates on the
brightest stars "so those sit at their Hipparcos distance". For 273 of the 88 781 HYG stars with
both, Gaia's relative error is the larger, 257 of them naked-eye and 38 by more than twice: Eta Leo
was drawn at Gaia's 556.6 pc ±17 % against Hipparcos's 389 pc ±6.2 %, Schedar and Tarazed at
Gaia's though both have Gaia G of about 2.

placementDistancePc now takes both relative errors and picks the smaller, Gaia's as before when
either is missing; fetchStars gives the placed star the error and the Gaia-distance flag of the
distance it took. The merge's combine keeps the Gaia entry's direction, and now takes the other
entry's distance with its error where that is the more precise, so a bright star Gaia's main query
also holds lands at its Hipparcos distance too. Gaia still wins for the rest, whose parallaxes are
some fifty times more precise.

From cache: 424 stars move, 386 of them naked-eye; HYG rows at Gaia's distance 58 379 -> 58 109 and
HYG stars flagged so 8 129 -> 8 095. Eta Leo 556.6 -> 389.1 pc, Tarazed 178.9 -> 121.1, Imai 139.5 ->
105.8, Schedar 71.0 -> 70.0, Alphecca 23.7 -> 23.0, each now "±" its Hipparcos error. Where the two
disagree by more than 5 σ (21 stars, Iot Gem 11 σ), one of the formal errors is wrong, and this
takes the smaller one at its word. The validators pass unchanged.

Controls, each failing its named test: the placement ignoring the errors, the merge keeping Gaia's
distance whatever the errors, and taking the distance but not its error (1 of 805 each).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:37:35 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 6d81c45f45 Carry the archive's positions back from Gaia DR2's J2015.5, where it publishes them, not J2016
fetchExoplanets placed each star it adds from the Exoplanet Archive by carrying the archive's
position back sixteen years, and 4c8e4a0 said the archive publishes at Gaia's J2016. It does not:
its positions are Gaia DR2's at J2015.5 although it names the DR3 source. Barnard's star in the
archive, 269.4486144, 4.7379808, equals DR2 4472832130942575872 at J2015.5 to 1e-7°, and sits 5.2″
from DR3's J2016 place; the review found 66 of the 67 archive-placed stars moving over 100 mas a
year within 0.21 mas of their DR2 position and none within 1 mas of DR3's. The matcher's comment
made the same claim of HD 133131 and TOI-2459, whose positions are DR2's too.

host-star-matching.ts now exports CATALOGUE_EPOCH and ARCHIVE_EPOCH = 2015.5, the matcher carries a
query back by their difference, and fetchExoplanets uses the same two, so the epoch is written
once. From cache: only the 3 277 archive-placed stars move, 2 287 of them by more than a
milliarcsecond, 74 by more than 50 and TOI-2406 most, by 203 mas, half a year of its 405 mas/yr;
no planet changes host. Invisible at map scale; the point is that the constant and its comments
now say what the archive does.

Control: ARCHIVE_EPOCH back to 2016.0 fails "carries Barnard's star from the archive's position to
where Gaia DR3's goes, to a few milliarcseconds" (1 of 802), which puts the two 5.2″ apart. The
GJ 15 A matching fixture is now built at J2015.5 too. fetchExoplanets' use of the constant has no
test of its own; the ETL has no test harness.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:20:26 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 62f81f2c43 Number the stars the archive places after their host's name, so a refresh keeps each one's id
4c8e4a0 numbered each star it adds from the Exoplanet Archive by its place among the unmatched
hosts, in pl_name order, and the refresh workflow re-queries the archive every Monday. One host
added or dropped ahead of another renumbers it: in the review, removing a single planet row
renamed 3 276 of the 3 277 ids, and a bookmark kept on Kepler-186 (1070001620) opened Kepler-1860
under Kepler-186's stored name. HYG's and Gaia's ids do not move between refreshes; the merge's own
comment says ids are meant to hold.

archiveStarId (host-star-matching.ts, beside the matcher the ETL already imports from there) hashes
the host name with FNV-1a into the 3.7 million ids between 1 070 000 000 and 2^30, and moves a name
whose id is taken to the next free one. The added stars are sorted by id before they are appended,
so the published list stays in id order. Measured: all 4 237 archive-hosted planets change host id
once (Kepler-186 is now 1073671518), none of the others; one of the 3 277 names was probed past a
collision, and one new id falls in the old 1070000000-1070003276 range, so a bookmark saved on that
old id would open the wrong star once. Dropping the same row from a copy of the cached answer and
rerunning the exoplanet step in a scratch copy of the ETL now leaves 3 276 of 3 276 ids unchanged.
The validators pass: no duplicate id, all under 2^30.

Controls, each failing its named test: the id taken from the order of arrival, and no probing past
a taken id (1 of 801 each).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:12:00 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 0e9ab6ffb5 Fold the Gliese entries that move with a Gaia star up to 160″ away, where a minute left 39 twice
74b93a0 let a Gliese-only HYG row fold into a Gaia entry that moves with it up to a minute of arc
away, since Gliese's positions are off by that much. Its report counted only the 3-60″ residue.
Measured on the published catalogue with the merge's own motion and brightness rules, 39 Gliese
rows within 25 pc still had a bare Gaia entry moving with them 60 to 150″ away (32 within 100″,
none past 150); with every row shifted a quarter of a degree north or south, none did. The review
found 36 of them to be the same star under SIMBAD, three within 10 pc: GJ 3618 (LHS 288) at 4.49 pc
beside its Gaia entry at 4.83 pc 94″ away, GJ 1123 at 8.13 and 9.52, GJ 1001 at 9.60 and 12.31.

MERGE_COMOVING_ANGULAR_TOLERANCE_DEG is now 160″. The ETL from cache folds 62 046 entries against
62 002, leaves 11 510 HYG rows without a counterpart against 11 554, and publishes 455 564 stars;
within 10, 25 and 50 pc the map now holds 369, 5 523 and 40 877 against 372, 5 564 and 40 921
(GCNS: 312 Gaia sources within 10 pc). No Gliese row within 25 pc has a co-moving bare Gaia entry
3-300″ away any more. GJ 3618, GJ 1123, Gl 319C and GJ 3999A now sit on Gaia entries. One
exoplanet changes host id: LHS 475 b's Gaia entry took HYG's id with its description.

Not every name lands where SIMBAD would put it: Gl 319C takes the entry SIMBAD calls GJ 319 B, as
HYG's Gl 319B already sat on SIMBAD's C, and GJ 3999A takes the entry named GJ 4000B before, which
moves to the bare one beside it. Both systems go from one entry too many to one per star; the
names follow HYG's positions, which only identifiers could correct. The merge validators hold: 23
cross-catalogue pairs within an arcsecond, as before.

Controls, each failing its named test: the window back to a minute (2 of 801 failed), and 200″
(1 of 801).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 20:59:05 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 4c8e4a02f3 Give every planet with a distance a star, from the archive where the catalogue has none
After matching, 4 237 planets still had no star: their hosts are too faint for either Gaia
query (fainter than G 12 past 50 pc) or too far (past 250 pc), Kepler-186 at 177.6 pc among
them. fetchExoplanets now adds one star per such host from the archive's own figures, 3 277
of them, whenever the archive gives a position and a distance:

- position carried back from J2016, where the archive publishes it (741 of the 746 matched
  hosts moving over 100 mas/yr sit nearer their star carried back, a median 0.11" against 3.47"
  as published), and placed at sy_dist;
- magnitude in V (2 999 hosts), else Gaia G (13), the band the catalogue's Gaia stars are
  already in; 265 have neither, 128 KMT, 95 OGLE and 32 MOA microlensing hosts at a median
  6.2 kpc among them, and take the ETL's faint stand-in of 15;
- colour as B-V from the archive's B and V, else from st_teff through a new
  temperatureToColorIndex (Ballesteros 2012, inverted; the Sun's 5 772 K gives 0.65), else
  left to st_spectype;
- ids from 1 070 000 000, past Gaia's two ranges and under the 2^30 validateStars enforces;
  source "exoplanet-archive".

Hosts past 250 pc are included: 399 of the 3 277 are within 250 pc, 1 962 between 250 pc and
1 kpc, 916 beyond. The drawn budget still chooses what is drawn (70 000 of 455 608).

Planets with a star: 2 090 -> 6 327 of 6 354. The other 27 have no distance in either table
(Luhman 16 A, mu2 Sco, PSR B1620-26 among them). Systems in the Solar Neighbourhood readout:
1 450 -> 4 736. validateExoplanets now refuses a catalogue where fewer than 99.5 % of planets
have a host (measured 99.58 %); dropping the added stars fails it at 2 090, and dropping the
composite fill at 6 227. No added star sits within an arcsecond of a catalogue star
(validateMerge's twins stay at 23); 5 of the 399 within 250 pc have one within a minute of arc,
VHS J125601.92-125723.9 (archive 12.7 pc) 5.8" from a Gaia entry at 21.2 pc the likeliest
duplicate.

In the app, searching TRAPPIST-1 or Kepler-186 and picking the star enters a system with its
seven and five planets drawn. gzip -9: stars.bin 5 030 741 -> 5 067 864 B, stars-meta.bin 2 784 614 -> 2 804 064,
stars-index.json 4 003 584 -> 4 015 882, exoplanets.json 342 467 -> 446 532 (host parameters,
both commits).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-24 22:09:16 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 74b93a0428 Fill in the Sun's faint neighbours from Gaia, and fold the Gliese entries they repeat
Gaia's G < 12 cut took a quarter of what lies within 10 pc: the red,
brown and white dwarfs most of the neighbourhood is made of, which the
map only had where Gliese happened to list them. Teegarden's Star was
missing, and with it its three planets' host.

A second query fetches the complement out to 50 pc: G >= 12 or no G,
parallax > 20 mas, with pmra/pmdec so the J2016 -> J2000 propagation
applies. The quality filter was chosen by counting. Parallax over error
> 5 keeps 39 751 of the 39 764 sources that pass the floor, but the Gaia
Catalogue of Nearby Stars (GCNS; Gaia Collaboration, Smart et al. 2021)
rejects 11 752 of them as spurious: median G 20.2, astrometric excess
noise 5.4 mas against 0.15 for the ones it keeps, 6 933 toward the
Galactic centre. So the query joins the GCNS main table (EDR3 astrometry
and source ids, which DR3 carries unchanged) and keeps 28 012 rows; the
error cut stays and costs no GCNS source, brown dwarfs included. The
query has its own row-count floor (28 012) and the row-limit cap, and is
ordered by (phot_g_mean_mag, source_id); a second ETL run reproduced
stars.bin, stars-meta.bin and stars-index.json byte for byte. Its ids
start at 1 050 000 000, clear of the main query's and under 2^30, which
V8 keeps unboxed: numbered from 2 000 000 000 they made the app's boot
task 230 ms longer (medians of five interleaved runs, 1.41 s against
1.18). validateStars now refuses an id outside 0 to 2^30.

The Gliese entries these stars duplicate were not folded: HYG carries
them with positions off by up to a minute of arc and photometric
distances, so they missed the 15" tolerance or failed the distance test.
Their proper motions, which Gliese measured well, give them away:
isSameStar now takes two entries moving within 20 % of each other as one
star up to 60" apart, whatever their distances, brightness still
permitting. Of the 602 Gliese-only rows left without a counterpart, 253
have such a Gaia entry; with every entry shifted a quarter degree, none
does. fetchStars passes HYG's motions only for rows without Hipparcos
astrometry: given them too, 15 Hipparcos stars took a co-moving
companion's Gaia entry and the cross-catalogue pairs under an arcsecond
went from 23 to 35. Of HYG's 1 200 stars fainter than V 12 within 25 pc,
1 024 now sit on a Gaia position (325 before); of the 176 left alone, 43
still have a Gaia entry 3-60" away (218 without the motion rule), some of
them real companions.

Measured on the rebuilt catalogue, against the GCNS (sources with
parallax > 100, 40 and 20 mas):
  within 10 pc  336 -> 372  (GCNS 312; the map adds 60 HYG-only stars)
  within 25 pc  3 652 -> 5 560  (GCNS 5 111)
  within 50 pc  13 702 -> 40 916  (GCNS 40 231)
452 331 stars (+27 214). Proxima, Barnard's Star, Wolf 359, Rigel, Deneb
and Alnilam are all present by name; Teegarden's Star is Gaia DR3
35227046884571776 at 3.83 pc and hosts its three planets. Luhman 16 is
not in Gaia DR3 with a parallax (5353626573555863424 has a two-parameter
solution) and stays absent. 94 more exoplanets find a host (2 071), none
changes host. TRAPPIST-1 is now drawn (Gaia DR3 2635476908753563008,
12.47 pc) but its planets are not yet matched to it.

Merge gate, ceilings unchanged: HYG rows without a Gaia counterpart
12 352 -> 11 554 (ceiling 15 000; 10 886 before the naked-eye stars),
cross-catalogue pairs under an arcsecond 23 -> 23 (ceiling 100). The
gate's comment now accounts for the survivors by magnitude.

gzip -9 sizes against the catalogue before both changes: stars.bin
4 711 922 -> 5 030 741 B, stars-meta.bin 2 576 213 -> 2 784 614 B,
stars-index.json 3 724 855 -> 4 003 584 B (+806 KB, 7.3 %). Boot on the
dev server, five interleaved cold runs: the task that indexes the
catalogue after the data lands, median 1 072 -> 1 182 ms; HUD shown,
median 2 622 -> 2 716 ms. This machine measured 0.82-1.30 s for the
same baseline task today, above audit #25's 627-843 ms. The drawn-star
budget is unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-24 20:35:21 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5 c64eea0803 Keep every star the naked eye sees, Rigel, Deneb and Alnilam among them
The 250 pc cutoff took 1 543 of HYG's 8 920 stars of V 6.5 or brighter:
1 339 that both surveys put past it and 204 HYG has no distance for. Five
of the fifty brightest stars in the sky were gone (Rigel, Deneb, Alnilam,
gamma-2 Vel, Wezen), and Naos, Sadr, Aludra and Arneb with them, while
11th-magnitude Gaia stars at the same distance were drawn. The cutoff
bounds a download, not what the sky shows.

placementDistancePc now keeps a star of V 6.5 or brighter at any distance,
at the better of its two distances as before: Gaia's where the archive's
Hipparcos cross-match has a usable parallax, Hipparcos's otherwise. Gaia
saturates on the brightest, so Rigel (264.6 pc), Deneb (432.9), Alnilam
(606.1), Wezen (492.6), Naos, Sadr, Aludra and Arneb sit at their
Hipparcos distance. 1 502 HYG rows come back, 165 of the 206 without a
Hipparcos distance among them because Gaia measured them; 36 fold into a
Gaia entry. 41 naked-eye stars stay out because neither survey gives them
a distance: beta Phe, Polis, Mu Cep, Rho Cas, Eta Car, Alp Cam, Phi Cas,
Chi Aur, Psi-1 Aur, theta-1 Ori, Omi-1 Cen, 66 Ori, 16 Sgr, 10 Sge and 27
HD stars.

Measured on the rebuilt catalogue: 425 117 stars (+1 466), 8 301 of them
past 250 pc (+1 466), the same 336 within 10 pc and 3 652 within 25 pc.
Merge gate: 12 352 HYG rows without a Gaia counterpart (was 10 886; the
ceiling of 15 000 is unchanged, and its comment now counts the naked-eye
stars among the survivors) and the same 23 cross-catalogue pairs under an
arcsecond. Five more exoplanets find their host: HD 81817 b and c,
HD 158996 b, HD 208527 b, HD 220074 b. gzip -9 sizes: stars.bin
4 711 922 -> 4 728 315 B, stars-meta.bin 2 576 213 -> 2 587 977 B,
stars-index.json 3 724 855 -> 3 731 763 B.

The brief behind this also asked to cut once on the best distance, which
would drop the 6 835 stars Hipparcos puts inside 250 pc and Gaia outside.
Those already sit at Gaia's distance (4eb61ff), so nothing is misplaced,
and they stay.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-24 19:36:34 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5 4eb61ff58e Draw each HYG star at Gaia's distance, and keep the ones Hipparcos misplaced
HYG and Gaia were both cut at 250 pc, each on its own distance. A star
Hipparcos put at 200 pc and Gaia at 300 was kept by the first, never
downloaded from the second, and drawn at 200. That is where 83% of the
9 691 mid-magnitude HYG stars without a Gaia counterpart came from, and at
the median Hipparcos had them a third too close. The mirror case, Hipparcos
outside and Gaia inside, dropped the HYG row and left its Gaia entry
anonymous.

Gaia's own Hipparcos cross-match (hipparcos2_best_neighbour, a fixed DR3
table of 99 525 rows) gives a usable Gaia distance for 97 751 of them.
placementDistancePc keeps a star either survey puts inside the cutoff, and
draws every kept star at the better measurement, inside the cutoff or not.
57 121 HYG stars now sit at Gaia's distance. 6 833 of them are past 250 pc:
Zet Per 230 -> 259 pc, 35 Ori 137 -> 330, 44 Cnc 223 -> 613, and the
farthest, HIP 69445, at 8.7 kpc. 3 666 stars that Hipparcos put outside are
now kept, and 3 656 of them give a Gaia entry its name.

The cross-match is required rather than skipped when unreachable. Without
it, every one of those stars would move back to its Hipparcos distance, and
the published map would flip with the archive's availability. The ESA TAP
answered it with a 500 at first and in 102 s on the next try. So fetches
now retry 5xx and network failures twice, after 30 s and 120 s, in the
fetch every source goes through. The refresh job also carries the Gaia DR3
responses from run to run in the Actions cache: the release is frozen, and
a live re-fetch has already reproduced stars.bin byte for byte.

423 651 stars (+10), 61 168 HYG rows folded into Gaia entries (+3 656),
351 597 unnamed designations (-3 656). 10 886 HYG survivors and 23 unmerged
pairs under an arcsecond, both inside the merge gate's ceilings. The same
1 972 exoplanets have a host; KELT-4 A b and MWC 758 c now sit on their
named star.

The HUD's "Radius" becomes "Survey radius": 250 pc is where Gaia is
surveyed to, and no longer the edge of the map.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016jxMkwA2rbicdGxHosecYi
2026-09-11 19:07:12 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Fable 5 dc2ce08694 Answer the review: direction settles distance, brightness is one-sided, and a lost id stops the scene
Three findings from the adversarial review of the merge, all reproduced.

The distance test was hiding 1 489 stars that sit under an arcsecond from
their Gaia entry with a Hipparcos parallax off by half — thirty of them at a
false few parsecs from the Sun (HIP 82724 at 3.7 pc, where Gaia has it at
62.8) — and the first audit did not see them because it counted residual
doubles through the same 50 % filter. Under three arcseconds the distances
are now not consulted: a coincidence of direction that close is never chance
at this depth (the quarter-degree shift finds none), and the parallax is the
thing to fix. Brightness keeps its say at any separation, and is now
one-sided: a folded entry may be five magnitudes fainter (a red dwarf in V
against G) but not one brighter, because an entry a magnitude brighter than
what is already at that spot is a primary Gaia does not carry — Almach,
Alfirk and Ashlesha had all been folded into their companions' entries,
93 in all. The sky grid wraps at 0h.

The Gaia query orders by source_id after G, so the row order — and the ids
assigned from it — is a function of the archive's content rather than of the
server's plan for 20 064 ties; the cache key is a hash of the query.

And a bookmark to a star id the catalogue no longer holds — 56 000 Gaia ids
change with this — sent the scene through reconcileSelection, enterSystem,
its decline, finishTransition and reconcileSelection again until the stack
overflowed. The selection is cleared instead, at the one place every path
goes through.

Regenerated: 423 641 stars, 57 512 HYG identities on Gaia positions, no HYG
id or name lost, no star within 20 pc left with an unclaimed Gaia entry under
an arcsecond. 403 HYG survivors still have an unclaimed Gaia entry within
60": 13 under an arcsecond, where the brightness guard does not trust HYG's
magnitude, and the rest components 3" to 60" from their counterpart.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QL6F9Bgfh8SgAiAAcPB9Hw
2026-08-28 21:20:45 +02:00
SenrokaiandClaude Fable 5 08534279fb Bring Gaia to HYG's epoch before merging, and keep a star's name when it matches
Gaia DR3 gives positions for J2016.0, HYG for 2000.0, and the merge matched
them on the sky to one arcsecond without propagating any proper motion.
Sixteen years of motion is 62" for Proxima and 166" for Barnard's Star, so
every star faster than ~62 mas/yr — most of the nearest ones — was kept twice,
some 23 000 in all. The slow ones were matched, and lost: the merge kept
Gaia's row whole, so 102 proper names, 1 336 Bayer/Flamsteed names and
32 000 spectral types became "Gaia DR3 <id>" and "Unknown", and 92 named
exoplanet hosts handed their planets to their anonymous twin.

Gaia is now asked for its proper motions and carried back to J2000 before it
leaves the fetcher. HYG is placed from its own x/y/z columns, which are right
where its `ra` is not: that column was carried from the Hipparcos epoch
without the cos δ its motion needs, 17.9" off for Proxima. A match combines
the two entries — Gaia's position, HYG's name, type, magnitude, colour and id
— instead of choosing one. The tolerance is 15" with a five-magnitude guard,
both set by measurement: 55 457 pairs sit under 1" once the epochs agree, the
Gliese-only entries up to 12" (Ross 248), shifting every entry a quarter of
a degree finds 16 chance neighbours at 15", and the guard keeps Sirius out
of Sirius B's entry. Entries of one source are never merged with each other:
the 1 411 Gaia doubles resolved under 1" are two stars, not one.

Regenerated: 425 071 stars (was 447 410), 56 082 of them Gaia positions
carrying HYG identities; no HYG id or name lost; the sixteen stars nearest
the Sun carry no survey designation; 196 residual doubles, all components
17" or more from their counterpart. Five planets of four bright giants
(7 CMa, HD 81688, omi UMa, xi Aql) lose their host link: their Gaia distance
sits 0.7–1.1 pc from the archive's Hipparcos-based one, past the 0.5 pc the
host match allows. Matching hosts on the sky rather than in space, as the
merge does, is the follow-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QL6F9Bgfh8SgAiAAcPB9Hw
2026-08-28 20:22:49 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 46cb923849 Refresh the astronomical catalogues
Scheduled re-run of the ETL against the live archives. Gated on the unit suite and a production build in this same run, because a GITHUB_TOKEN push triggers no CI of its own.
2026-08-24 06:05:56 +00:00
Claude 29fd92d118 Widen the star catalogue, and separate what is drawn from what is known
The map held 8750 stars within 50 pc and rendered 371 systems. Both were
lower than they needed to be, for different reasons.

The star catalogue was capped by its own encoding as much as by the
cutoff: one JSON object per star, eight key names repeated each time, 157
bytes a star. At the range HYG actually reaches that is 17 MB to download
and parse before the first frame. So the numbers move into two binary
column stores — positions in stars.bin, which the GPU is handed verbatim,
and id/magnitude/colour/spectral index in stars-meta.bin — and the JSON
keeps only the strings, with 2600 distinct spectral classifications
collapsed to a dictionary. The layout is defined once, in star-catalog.ts,
and the ETL and the app both use it, so the writer and the reader cannot
drift.

The cutoff then goes to 250 pc: 68388 stars, 7.8x as many for 1.7x the
bytes. That is where HYG's measurements stop rather than a round number —
98.6% of its rows are Hipparcos, whose parallaxes are good to about a
milliarcsecond, so beyond 250 pc it would be plotting noise.

Drawing all of them is a separate question from knowing them, and it is
answered separately. The field draws a budget: every star inside 25 pc,
because the nearest are faint red dwarfs and Proxima Centauri is magnitude
11, then the brightest of everything beyond. Search, navigation and the
planet cross-reference still see the whole catalogue. A real GPU would
draw all 68388 without noticing; the budget is for the machines that would
not, and it is one constant.

Systems were limited by something else entirely. The archive data already
shipped named 4735 host stars and only 388 resolved, because the rest lay
outside a 50 pc catalogue — and the cross-reference kept only its own
result, so redoing it meant re-downloading an archive that is not
reachable from here. Host coordinates are now stored with each planet, and
the match is re-resolved at build time against whatever catalogue the run
produced. Even name matching alone, which needs no coordinates and so
works on the records already shipped, rescues 335 planets across 238
systems: 371 renderable systems become 609.

Two selection rules were tuned for a 50 pc bubble and no longer fit.
Tethers followed the Sun's nearest neighbours, which are a speck at this
range, and now follow the brightest; labels were ranked by proximity,
which named whatever sat nearest the middle of the screen, and are now
ranked by brightness — so the view names Canopus, Achernar and Spica
rather than a clump of catalogue designations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WaySiNst4HhDXBHnMy8p5G
2026-08-05 08:35:41 +00:00
Senrokai d7e8ea1d4d @
Add star-map Angular app, ETL pipeline, and caveman plugin

Angular 3D star map (galaxy/system/body views, Three.js rendering,
navigation store) plus the NASA ETL tooling that builds the star,
exoplanet and solar-system datasets, Playwright e2e suite, and the
cs:caveman Claude Code plugin (command, agent, skill).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@
2026-08-03 16:50:10 +02:00