For an archive-placed host with a temperature and no B magnitude, fetchExoplanets took B−V from
Ballesteros' blackbody fit, which runs 0.1 to 0.2 redder than Pecaut & Mamajek's dwarf sequence
below 3 800 K, and the luminosity then read its correction off that sequence at that colour: 3 500 K
came back as 3 102 K with a correction 1.15 magnitudes too large, anything under about 3 170 K was
clamped to B−V 2.00, and the card printed it as a measured "Colour B−V 2.00". CFBDSIR
J145829+101343, a 580 K brown dwarf, read "Spectral type ~M6, from colour".
temperatureToColorIndex now reads the table itself backwards, interpolating B−V between the two
types the temperature falls between, so the temperature and correction read back off the colour
are the table's at that temperature; it has no answer outside 2 420 to 31 400 K. The colour is
flagged colorFromTemperature, a fifth bit in the photometry byte (the format, README and the ETL's
round-trip check follow), and the card prints it "B−V 1.66, from its temperature", marked derived.
From cache: 57 archive stars change colour; 54 carry the flag and 3, CFBDSIR J145829+101343 among
them, now have none. For the 47 of them the archive gives a luminosity, the one derived from
magnitude and colour moves from a median 0.228 dex off it to 0.124; Kepler-445 (3 157 K) from
0.0282 L☉ to 0.0080 against the archive's 0.0079. Its colour goes from 2.00 to 1.67. The card shows
the archive's luminosity where it has one since earlier on this branch, so this is the figure used
for the rest and for their radii.
Controls, each failing its named test: the nearest hotter row taken without interpolating (2 of
803 failed), no refusal outside the table, the flag not encoded, and the card calling the colour
measured (1 of 803 each).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
23547defe0