321540ed91e193ce555f1a706111f7cd1af6dacc
295
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
89c2568018 |
Describe the star at a system's centre as it is drawn now, not by the innermost-orbit rule and its halo
The README still said the star was sized against its innermost orbit and made visible by a halo, two things |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a70a7290f3 |
Test that the host matcher carries an archive row back from J2015.5, where the constant only was
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
69a052730f |
Test that the system view warms a host's planets by the luminosity the archive gives it
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
15b8f2dff3 |
Say which stars sit at the Gliese catalogue's distances, about half of them no parallax at all
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5ab4c5df89 |
Say a planet has no temperature because its star's luminosity or its orbit is unknown, not its star
The card and the body page said "Its host star is not in the catalogue" for every planet without
an equilibrium temperature. Over the shipped data that is 2 714 planets, and the host really is
missing for 27. 2 420 have no semi-major axis, and since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8f99335bae |
Give a luminosity below a hundredth of the Sun's two figures, so Proxima reads 0.0015 L☉ not 0.002
formatLuminosity printed three decimals from a thousandth to 1 L☉, which leaves one figure below
a hundredth.
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
95ffb009a2 |
Tint each star in the field the colour its own disc is drawn in, a blackbody at its temperature
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a8f394cf57 |
Read a giant's temperature off its type as well as its correction, so a radius has one source
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
06b4ff64b5 |
Read a white dwarf past the table's blue end at the temperature white dwarfs of its colour have
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
18faa6d0b2 |
Classify a star for the rows that list it, not every star each time the index is built
The search index and the route index gave every one of the 455 571 stars a subtitle up front through spectralClassification, which filtered the dwarf table afresh on each call; the star field's tints read the same table once per BP−RP star. Both indices now carry the star itself and classify it only for the rows shown (entrySubtitle): eight search results, a few route options. The two filtered columns of the table are built once. Node, over the shipped catalogue, five runs: classifying every star 121-167 ms before, 56-62 after hoisting the table alone; reading the sequence at every BP−RP colour 187-216 ms, now 111-127. In the app on :4302, two cold loads each, the long task when the Search tab opens was 264-380 ms (median 280) before and 164-276 ms (median 171) after; the longest boot task 863 and 875 ms before, 654 and 741 after. Tests: the search spec checks its index holds no classification and the row still reads "Star · ~M8"; the scene spec now reads the route options, and checks its index holds none either. Controls: classifying every star in the search index, doing so in the route index, and route options printing the index's subtitle each fail the named test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d449214309 |
Stop calling WASP-108 b imaged, and stop saying no map exists of an imaged exoplanet
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
936d1c01f8 |
Leave a system outwards from wherever the camera stands, and test that the scene frames the furthest it draws
Leaving a system flew the camera to a fixed 400 AU. Since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f6bb2b9584 |
Pin the 1972 hand-over to the leap seconds from the later side too
The test named for the hand-over caught the switch moved earlier and passed with it moved up to six months later: both samples round midnight then fall on the polynomial (a step of about 0), the last day of 1971 still reads 42.2485 s, and the 1972-06-30 = 42.184 check only sees a move past June. Such a switch leaves TT - UT up to 0.59 s high through the first half of 1972. The test now also requires 1 January 1972 itself to read the table's 42.184 s, the 10 s TAI - UTC began with plus 32.184. Control: the switch moved to JD_1972 + 120 now fails "hands over from the polynomial to the leap seconds at the start of 1972" only (1 failed, 843 passed of 844); before, the suite passed 841 of 841. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
83dc46416b |
Test an exoplanet's aphelion in the framing radius and a derived surface's white, and give Earth's old TDB error as 8.6 degrees
Two lines the review found unguarded, each now held by a test that fails without it:
- outermostRadiusAu takes an exoplanet's eccentricity as well as a solar-system body's.
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
acc4b928f2 |
Say that Makemake's day is known only to a factor of two, citing both readings
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4cd08ee324 |
Credit the IAU W on the three moons whose orbits take terms from it, guard Tethys's, and say what Mimas's lock ceiling is
Since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
48fd6fd0e5 |
Stop telling the reader that the hundred directly imaged exoplanets were never imaged
Every exoplanet card without a map ended "Not an observation — no image of this world exists.",
and
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ff744a00de |
Place a naked-eye star HYG gives no distance for by its Hipparcos parallax, where that is 2.5 times its error
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8c3a86097c |
Place a star at whichever of its two distances is the more precise, not at Gaia's regardless
placementDistancePc took Gaia's distance wherever the cross-match gave a usable one, and its
docstring and
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
23547defe0 |
Read an archive host's colour off the dwarf sequence at its temperature, and say it was not measured
For an archive-placed host with a temperature and no B magnitude, fetchExoplanets took B−V from Ballesteros' blackbody fit, which runs 0.1 to 0.2 redder than Pecaut & Mamajek's dwarf sequence below 3 800 K, and the luminosity then read its correction off that sequence at that colour: 3 500 K came back as 3 102 K with a correction 1.15 magnitudes too large, anything under about 3 170 K was clamped to B−V 2.00, and the card printed it as a measured "Colour B−V 2.00". CFBDSIR J145829+101343, a 580 K brown dwarf, read "Spectral type ~M6, from colour". temperatureToColorIndex now reads the table itself backwards, interpolating B−V between the two types the temperature falls between, so the temperature and correction read back off the colour are the table's at that temperature; it has no answer outside 2 420 to 31 400 K. The colour is flagged colorFromTemperature, a fifth bit in the photometry byte (the format, README and the ETL's round-trip check follow), and the card prints it "B−V 1.66, from its temperature", marked derived. From cache: 57 archive stars change colour; 54 carry the flag and 3, CFBDSIR J145829+101343 among them, now have none. For the 47 of them the archive gives a luminosity, the one derived from magnitude and colour moves from a median 0.228 dex off it to 0.124; Kepler-445 (3 157 K) from 0.0282 L☉ to 0.0080 against the archive's 0.0079. Its colour goes from 2.00 to 1.67. The card shows the archive's luminosity where it has one since earlier on this branch, so this is the figure used for the rest and for their radii. Controls, each failing its named test: the nearest hotter row taken without interpolating (2 of 803 failed), no refusal outside the table, the flag not encoded, and the card calling the colour measured (1 of 803 each). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c45d9160e3 |
Frame the Sun's system on Eris's aphelion, the furthest it draws, not on the grid ring inside it
The scene framed the grid's outer ring, sized from the largest semi-major axis, and two comments said the ring was "always the wider of the two, by construction". That held until Eris came in: its a = 67.93 AU gives an 80 AU ring, but with e = 0.438 its orbit reaches 97.7 AU, and Eris is 95.5 AU out now. The 12 per cent margin protected the ring, not Eris. The review measured Eris's orbit at 0.982 of the half-width on a 390x844 phone (3.5 px from the edge), 0.987 on 1000x1400, and on a 1000x1000 window Eris's marker at NDC 1.002, off screen on arrival. SystemOrbitsRenderer.gridOuterRadiusAu becomes outermostRadiusAu: the ring, or the largest top-level aphelion a(1 + e) where that runs past it. The scene frames that. Some orbit runs past its ring in 303 of the 1 190 exoplanet systems too (counted on exoplanets.json), and they are framed the same way. The 500 AU ceiling rises to 600: the aphelion needs 508 AU on a 390x844 phone, and 600 holds it with its whole margin down to an aspect of 0.39. The comments are corrected. Measured in the app on :4301 after entering the Sun, Eris's drawn orbit, largest |NDC x| over its 129 vertices (review's figures before): 390x844 camera 507.9 AU 0.804 (0.982) 1000x1400 camera 328.5 AU 0.805 (0.987) 1000x1000 camera 234.7 AU 0.812 (1.004, marker off screen) 950x1000 camera 247.0 AU 0.810 1600x1000 camera 234.7 AU 0.508 (0.627) No orbit vertex of Neptune, Pluto, Eris, Haumea or Makemake is off screen at any of them. The cost: inner bodies arrive smaller, the landscape camera 235 AU out instead of 192. Tests: renderer 'reaches as far as an eccentric orbit goes past the grid: Eris's aphelion, 97.7 AU, not the 80 AU ring' (and the ring where every orbit stays inside it), and framing 'leaves Eris's aphelion its whole margin in every window shape'. Controls, each failing its named test only (1 failed, 839 passed): framing on the ring alone; the ceiling back at 500 AU. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f82b5e1c74 |
Hold the published catalogue to what its host radii, distance errors and Gaia-distance flags come to
Three things the branch added could vanish from the data with every check passing, as the review
showed with guarded ETL mutants: dropping st_rad or st_teff from each planet left 0 of 6 354
carrying their host's radius or temperature, storing Gaia's parallax_error in milliarcseconds
rather than over the parallax changed 431 464 distance readouts, and dropping the flag fetchStars
sets relabelled 8 129 HYG stars placed at Gaia's distance "HYG". The round trip compares decoded
with encoded, and the counts of missing bands and errors do not look at what the values are.
validateExoplanets now requires 90 % of planets to carry their host's radius and temperature
(measured 6 030 and 6 054 of 6 354). validateStars requires the median relative error of the
distances at Gaia's to be under 1 % (measured 0.33 %), at most 1 % of stars to have a parallax
distance with an error of a fifth or more (measured 1 109, 0.24 %; the archive's, which are on the
distance and never ranged, are left out), and at least 6 000 HYG stars flagged at Gaia's distance
(measured 8 129). Figures from an ETL run from cache on this branch.
Each proved by a guarded mutant in a scratch copy of the ETL, run from the cache, failing with its
own message: host radius dropped ("Only 0 of 6354 exoplanets carry their host's radius and 6054 its
temperature"), host temperature dropped ("6030 ... and 0"), the Gaia error left in mas ("The median
error of Gaia's distances is 1.92 %"), the same with the median check waived ("17689 parallax
distances have an error of a fifth or more"), and the flag dropped ("Only 0 HYG stars are flagged
at Gaia's distance"); a no-op edit completed. No ceiling is loosened.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
6d81c45f45 |
Carry the archive's positions back from Gaia DR2's J2015.5, where it publishes them, not J2016
fetchExoplanets placed each star it adds from the Exoplanet Archive by carrying the archive's
position back sixteen years, and
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
3453cd5d9f |
Say which cards give how far their orbit strays, since Pluto's does not
The date field's description read "Each moon's and dwarf planet's card says how far its orbit strays from 1950 to 2100." Pluto is a dwarf planet on its card, but it moves on Standish's planet elements, and the ETL measures only moons and the SBDB bodies against Horizons: its card ends "Orbit: JPL approximate mean elements (Standish), fit for 3000 BC to AD 3000." and gives no stray figure. In bodies.json, Ceres (7.2), Eris (0.1), Haumea (0.4), Makemake (0.3) and every moon carry one; Pluto does not. The description now reads "AD 1 to AD 3000, where the planets' and Pluto's elements hold. Each moon's card, and Ceres's, Eris's, Haumea's and Makemake's, says how far its orbit strays from 1950 to 2100." The CLOCK_WINDOW comment and the scene's note comment make the same distinction. Test: hud-dock 'opens the date field on the clock's date...' asserts the new sentence. Control: putting the old sentence back fails that test only (1 failed, 836 passed). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
85cb66e63c |
Test that a photograph shows in its own colours once it reaches its body
Since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
20c34f9662 |
Test the 1972 hand-over to the leap seconds where it happens, and give the ΔT comment its measured joins
The continuity test sampled 1972 at 2451544.5 + (1972 - 2000) x 365.2425 +/- 0.01 d, which is JD
2441317.70 and .72; the switch is at the calendar's 1 January 1972, JD 2441317.5, so both samples
read the leap-second table (42.184 and 42.184) and the join was never compared. Moving the switch
two years early (a 1.99 s step in 1970) passed all 836 tests. The hand-over now has its own test:
the step across midnight must be under 0.1 s (it is 0.067: 42.2514 to 42.184), and the last day of
1971 must still read the polynomial's 42.2485 s. Control: the switch at JD_1972 - 730 fails that
test only (1 failed, 836 passed).
The polynomials' own joins, measured 1e-6 d either side: 0.251 s at 1600, 0.162 at 1700, 0.087 at
500, 0.088 at 1900, and under 0.06 elsewhere.
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
62f81f2c43 |
Number the stars the archive places after their host's name, so a refresh keeps each one's id
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
cbe4908219 |
Turn Earth by the Earth Rotation Angle, so its lit face stays Horizons' at AD 1 as it is today
Earth was turned by its IAU W, taken at the clock's UT plus today's 69.184 s. That W is a straight
line fitted to the present: 360.9856235 degrees a day, which, once its pole's -0.641 degrees a
century in right ascension is counted, runs 6.3e-6 degrees a day slow of Earth's real turning. The
followsUt comment said the clock's date "already says how far it has turned"; it did not. Against
Horizons (observer quantity 14 from the Sun, TIME_TYPE=UT, Earth one light-time back) the drawn
sub-solar point was 2.3 degrees off at AD 1000 and 4.5 at AD 1.
Earth is now turned by the IERS Earth Rotation Angle (IERS Conventions 2010, eq. 5.15) at the
clock's date, counted from the node the IAU's W starts at, 90 degrees past the pole's right
ascension. The pole is unchanged. Drawn minus Horizons, in degrees:
date before after
2025-06-01 12:00 (unit) +0.06 -0.003
AD 1000, JD 2086455 (unit) -2.3 -0.001
AD 1, JD 1721600 (unit) -4.5 +0.051
live app, :4301, same probe as the review's
JD 2460900.25 +0.089 +0.005
JD 2086300.5 -2.281 +0.010
JD 1800000 -4.049 +0.056
JD 1721450.75 -4.530 +0.072
At noon UTC on 1 June 2025 the Sun now stands over 0.52 W on the drawn sphere, where the equation
of time puts it at 0.53 W (0.43 W before).
TT_MINUS_UTC_DAYS had no other use and is removed; its comment also counted 37 leap seconds where
UTC has taken 27 on top of the 10 s it started from in 1972.
Tests: body-orientation.spec 'lights Earth's face where Horizons does at the far end of the clock
too: AD 1000 and AD 1' (within 0.15 degrees), and the renderer's AD 1000 Earth test now checks the
drawn face against Horizons instead of against the IAU W the old code used. Control: turning Earth
by its IAU W at UT + 69.184 s again fails both named tests (2 failed, 834 passed). The README says
which model turns Earth.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
1a8e734651 |
Leave the dark nebulae out of the backdrop, whose sprites can only add light
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
0e9ab6ffb5 |
Fold the Gliese entries that move with a Gaia star up to 160″ away, where a minute left 39 twice
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
150ec76bbd |
Say that a host's radius, temperature and luminosity come from the composite table alone
The comment on hostStarRadiusSolar and its two neighbours said they were read from "the planet's default row first, then the composite table". The default-row query (TAP_COLUMNS in fetchExoplanets.ts) asks for none of st_rad, st_teff or st_lum — the cached answer's columns end at st_mass and disc_year — so host() always reads them from pscomppars, whose columns may each cite a different reference: Proxima's 0.141 R☉ is the composite table's. It also said they were measured where stellar.ts derives a luminosity, which held for the luminosity only once starSurfaceOf began reading st_lum, earlier on this branch; it now points at starSurfaceOf. A comment, so there is no test to fail. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4ebe663a84 |
Carry the Hipparcos parallax errors between weekly refreshes, as the Gaia answers already are
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
08bf8b18a6 |
Test that a Gaia star with no measured band is still labelled Gaia's
describingCatalogue calls a star Gaia's when its source is gaia and its band is not V. 44 Gaia sources in the shipped catalogue have no G (Gaia DR3 40091256260676736 among them), and nothing tested them: narrowing the rule to band G, which would relabel all 44 "HYG" and count them as HYG in the neighbourhood census, passed the suite. The existing test already builds such a star and now checks its Source row as well. Control: the rule narrowed to band G fails "says a stand-in magnitude was not measured, and leaves out a colour there is none of" (1 of 797). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
f8af0ecf6e |
List stars in search and routes by the type their colour gives them, and say where archive positions come from
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4191b70e63 |
Tint a star measured in Gaia's BP−RP as the B−V of the dwarf of that colour
colorIndexToRgb maps a B−V onto the star field's tint ramp, and its one caller passed it every star's colour index, whatever colorSystem said. BP−RP is the larger of the two for the same star — 0.823 against 0.65 for a G2 dwarf, 1.84 against 1.42 for an M0 (Pecaut & Mamajek) — so the 376 703 stars measured in it, 83 % of the catalogue, were tinted as later types than they are, and redder than HYG's stars of the same type, and than their own disc in the system view. A BP−RP is now carried to the B−V of the dwarf sequence at that colour (the table's own B−V column, which DwarfSequencePoint now returns, clamped at its ends), then tinted as before. The median Gaia colour, BP−RP 0.883, a G7 dwarf, read as a K2: its tint goes from (1, 0.972, 0.955) to (0.975, 0.982, 1), the same as HYG's G7 stars. Controls, each failing its named test: BP−RP read as B−V (2 of 792 failed), the star field not passing the colour system (1 of 792), and the B−V taken from the wrong column (3 of 792). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
fa52f6a818 |
Give an archive star's distance error as the error on the distance it is, not as a parallax range
formatDistance printed any error of a fifth or more as the range a parallax's error makes, d/(1+e) to d/(1−e). A star the ETL places from the Exoplanet Archive carries the mean of sy_disterr1 and 2 instead, which the archive defines as one-sided errors on sy_dist in parsecs, and many of those distances come from a lensing model with no parallax behind them. 129 of the 3 195 archive stars with an error were printed as ranges the archive does not give: KMT-2016-BLG-1836L as 5.8 to 9.2 kpc, where the archive publishes 7 100 +800 −2 400 pc, and AT2021ueyL as 664 pc to 2.4 kpc against 1 040 +740 −440. The card now tells formatDistance when the error is on the distance (source exoplanet-archive), and it keeps the ± at any size. Measured on the shipped catalogue: KMT-2016-BLG-1836L reads 7.1 ± 1.6 kpc, AT2021ueyL 1.0 ± 0.6 kpc, EPIC 201170410 134 ± 43 pc, KMT-2016-BLG-0212L 6.3 ± 1.3 kpc. The ETL keeps only the mean, so a lopsided interval such as KMT-2016-BLG-1836L's is shown symmetric; carrying both errors would take a second column in stars-meta.bin. The doc comments on formatDistance and on distanceError no longer say an archive distance is an inverted parallax. Controls, each failing its named test: the error on the distance read as a parallax's (2 of 790 failed), and the card not saying it is on the distance (1 of 790). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d1aa22ed61 |
Frame a giant so its disc sits inside the ring its neighbours are named on
The system view names a star's neighbours on a ring at 0.74 of the view's tighter half-extent, whatever the star. A giant was framed to fill the frame, 2.4 radii out, which the three-radius closest approach then overrode, so it settled at 3 radii with its disc projecting to 0.758 of the half-extent: in the app, Betelgeuse's disc was 379 px on a 1 000 px view against the 370 px ring, and HD 39374 and HD 38118 were printed on it at about 1.3:1 contrast. The star's term in the framing distance now places its silhouette, asin(R / d), at half the tighter half-extent, which puts the camera 4.4 radii out on a 50° view. Measured on :4302 at 1600 by 1000: Betelgeuse settles at 13.9 AU (closest approach 9.5) with a 250 px disc and Antares at 14.1 AU; the nearest corner of any neighbour's name is 292 px from the centre, so none is on either disc (it was two and one of them before). Closing in to the closest approach can still bring the disc over the names; that is the viewer's choice, not the arrival's. This also gives the star's term a job: at 2.4 radii it never exceeded the closest approach, so dropping it changed nothing (the previous commit's one surviving control). Controls, each failing its named test: the star left out of the framing (1 of 788 failed), the star framed to fill the frame (2 of 788), and the disc taken as flat (1 of 788). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5aac46de08 |
Draw a star nothing gives a size or temperature for as a grey point, not as the Sun
The system view drew every star without a radius at the Sun's radius, and every star without a temperature in the Sun's colour. PSR J1719-1438, a neutron star 10 km across, came out 1 R☉ wide, wider than its planet's 0.0044 AU orbit, and b spent nine tenths of its orbit inside it; Procyon B, a white dwarf of 0.012 R☉ with a type the parser does not read and no colour, was a Sun 81 times too wide in the Sun's colour. Such a star is now drawn at 150 km, under the three-pixel floor from anywhere the camera can go, so the floor's point is what shows, and its disc keeps the photograph's own grey instead of the Sun's tint. Its light stays white, which is the photographs' own light rather than a claim about the star. 2 858 stars take this after the clamping in the previous commit, against 3 077 drawn at the Sun's radius before it. In the app on :4302: PSR J1719-1438's star is drawn at 1.7×10⁻⁴ AU (the floor, 168 times its geometry) with b 0.00417 AU from its centre, outside it; Gl 280B at the floor, tint (1, 1, 1) and no radius on its card; Proxima at 0.141 R☉, tint (1, 0.459, 0.135), light (1, 0.523, 0.165), card "Luminosity 0.002 L☉" unmarked and "Radius 0.141 solar radii". The scene's use of the star's surface had no test: every star in the scene spec was drawn at the Sun's radius, and drawing all of them so, lighting planets white, tinting every disc as the Sun or closing the camera to the Sun's clearance all passed. The spec now gives Proxima its planet's archive row and adds Antares and Procyon B, and three tests enter them. Controls, each failing its named test: every star at the Sun's radius (3 of 787 failed), an unmeasured one at it, the light without the temperature, the closest approach for the Sun, the Sun's tint for a host, the Sun's tint for a star without a temperature, and the card without the surface (1 of 787 each). Dropping the star from the framing distance was not caught: its term, 2.4 radii, never exceeds the three-radius closest approach the camera is clamped to, so it cannot change where the camera settles. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
31e0c04fe1 |
Read a colour past either end of the dwarf table at that end, where the star has no type instead
dwarfSequenceAtColor answers null outside Pecaut & Mamajek's table, B−V −0.301 to 2.16 and BP−RP −0.12 to 5.1, and effectiveTemperatureK then fell back on the type, which Gaia's stars do not have and carbon stars' parser does not read. 219 stars with a measured colour got no temperature and so no radius, and were drawn at the Sun's radius in the Sun's colour: 110 white dwarfs within 50 pc, 38 Gaia stars redder than BP−RP 5.1 (Gaia DR3 6439125097427143808, an ultracool dwarf 4.0 pc away), HD 46687, La Superba and the other carbon stars, and an O8 star. Past the table, the colour is now read at the row it is past (clampToTable), but only for a star with no readable type: beside a type an off-table colour is more often the bad measurement — HD 49748 is G5 V at B−V −0.32 — so the type still wins there, as it did. The luminosity reads the same point, so a star past the red end also gets the M8.5 row's G−V and correction. A type's own colour past the table, which only O types have, is read at B0. Carbon and S stars (C, N, R, S) now count as giants, so their correction stays their type's, not an M8.5 dwarf's −5.78. Measured on the shipped catalogue: stars without a temperature 3 053 -> 2 834, without a radius 3 077 -> 2 858; all 292 stars with an off-table colour now have a temperature, against 73. Gaia DR3 6439125097427143808 is 2 420 K and 0.110 R☉ (M8.5 V: 0.104); the 110 white dwarfs a median 0.018 R☉ at 10 700 K (0.0013 to 0.034); HD 46687 212 R☉ at 2 420 K and La Superba 133; audit #16's Gaia DR3 5612323414549657984, k1 Pup, B6 V at BP−RP −0.15, 203 L☉ and 4.1 R☉ against 143 and none (FLAME gives 336 and 3.49). The 2 851 stars left without a radius have neither a colour nor a readable type, or no band. Controls, each failing its named test: no clamp for an untyped star (2 of 784 failed), the clamp winning over a type, an O type's colour unclamped, the luminosity off the unclamped sequence, and carbon stars not counted as giants (1 of 784 each); clampToTable ignored (3 of 784). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
dc7277f740 |
Say in the textures README that the mission mosaics' brightness is not albedo, as Iapetus shows
Iapetus's leading hemisphere has an albedo of 0.03-0.05 and its trailing one 0.5-0.6, about a tenth. On iapetus.jpg, between 30 S and 30 N, the leading side (30-150 W) averages 83.4 of 255 and the trailing (30-150 E) 108.2, a ratio of 0.77, measured here again; the USGS source gives the same (83.3 and 108.1), so it is the mosaics' frame-by-frame contrast stretch, not the processing. The README's Iapetus row checked only where Cassini Regio lies, and nothing said the brightness is not albedo; it now does, with those figures. The map is not rescaled: no photometric model was applied to any body, and one hemisphere's worth of scaling would be invented for this one. Documentation only; no behaviour changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d93bb1ee2c |
Say that Pluto's tilt is checked against its own IAU pole, not against Horizons
The ETL's obliquity check, its failure message and the renderer spec's test name all compared Pluto's drawn tilt with "the obliquity Horizons gives", as |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
98c4eb901f |
Credit the sources the solar system's orbits now come from, in the README and a search comment
Since |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a281f22f34 |
Measure every moon and dwarf planet against Horizons from 1950 to 2100, and say on its card how far it strays
The clock reaches AD 1 to AD 3000, but only the planets' cards named a span their elements hold
over; the 25 moons and the four SBDB dwarf planets gave a source and an epoch, though
BodyRecord.orbitSource is documented as "the span they hold over". And the worst offsets the ETL
stated came from twelve New Year's Days: Nereid's year is 360 days, so all twelve fell far from
its periapsis, where a mean ellipse is furthest out. The one date the ETL checked, 2025-01-01, saw
Nereid at 2.6 degrees; it reaches 11.19.
For each moon and each SBDB dwarf planet the ETL now fetches Horizons' ICRF vectors from 1950 to
2100, every other day (daily for Nereid, at an eccentricity of 0.75, and Hyperion, whose row's
eccentricity is a quarter of its real one: every other day gave it 22.14, daily 22.23), and
measures how far the mean elements stray, at the same TDB dates. The card appends it: "JPL SBDB
osculating elements, epoch 2026 Jun 9, within 7.2 degrees of Horizons from 1950 to 2100". Worst
offsets on the real catalogue: the Moon 2.62 (2010 March 27), Phoebe 2.58 (1969, where a comment
claimed "within 2.0"), Phobos 1.26, Mimas 7.43, Iapetus 10.34, Nereid 11.19 (2039 Nov 1),
Hyperion 22.23 (2055 Feb 26), Ceres 7.12 (1953); Io 0.07, Titan 0.06, Eris 0.06.
build.ts recomputes each from the same Horizons positions and fails if an orbit other than
Standish's names no span, if a card states less than it strays, or if a body passes its ceiling:
3 degrees, and Hyperion 23, Nereid 12, Iapetus 11, Mimas 8 and Ceres 8, each explained. The
2025-01-01 check stays for reading errors, its comment no longer passing one date's offsets off as
worst ones. The Sun's note says the moons' and those four's elements were checked from 1950 to
2100, and the date field's description that each card says how far its orbit strays over that span.
In the running app Ceres's, Phobos's and Nereid's cards end "within 7.2", "1.3" and "11.2 degrees
of Horizons from 1950 to 2100".
The CLOCK_WINDOW comment also had the calendars the wrong way at AD 1: proleptic Gregorian dates
are two days behind the Julian calendar there, level from AD 200 to 300, and ten days ahead by
1582. It now says so, and names Ceres's drift where it named Phobos's, which its orbit now carries.
Controls: the ETL measuring nothing fails ("Ceres's orbit ... names no span it holds over"),
rounding the stated figure down fails on Ceres (7.1 against 7.12), and Nereid held to the general
ceiling fails at 11.19; the note and the date field without the span fail their named tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d097f4b477 |
Correct a giant's light by its type, not by the cooler dwarf its colour reads as
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2d4b8a98d5 |
Put each body's photograph on it one frame at a time, so entering the Sun's system no longer stalls
buildMarker gave every photographed body its map at once. A texture is copied to the GPU in the first frame that draws it, and the 28 maps arrive within about 40 ms of each other, so that frame copied some 20 megapixels of JPEG (seven maps at 2048x1024) through copyExternalImageToTexture: a second long task of 135-162 ms about 1.25 s after entering, measured here four times on the committed renderer (reviewers measured 160-210 against 85-100 without the 18 new maps). de34fff's "adds no long task" was measured before those maps landed. A photographed body now starts in its kind's flat colour, as a derived one does, and its texture waits in a queue; each update() puts the first one that has loaded on its body. The copies are spread one a frame, and all 38 bodies have their maps within half a second of the first. In the running app, five fresh entries into the Sun's system at 1600x1000 left one long task of 52-66 ms or none at all ([66], [52], [62], [], [56] ms, where the committed renderer gave [62, 149], [56, 135], [74, 162], [78, 162]). Control: putting every loaded photograph on in one frame fails "puts them on their bodies once loaded, one a frame". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d94451e203 |
Warm a host's planets by the luminosity the archive publishes for it, not one derived beside it
The ETL has carried each host's st_lum since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
6c0626ca38 |
Frame the Sun's system out to Eris on a portrait window, where Eris and Makemake arrived off screen
The arrival framing fits the grid's outer ring, which Eris (a = 67.93 AU) took from 40 AU to 80, but its 200 AU ceiling was sized for Pluto's ring. At 390 by 844 the ring needs 416 AU and at 1000 by 1400 269, so both were clamped to 200: Eris arrived at NDC (2.08, 0.48) on the phone, with Makemake at (-1.14, -0.25), and at (1.34, 0.48) on the tall window. The spec never saw it, its solar system ending at Neptune. The ceiling is now 500 AU, which frames the 80 AU ring at any aspect down to 0.385; the landscape fit is unchanged. The window-shape test now includes the solar system out to Eris and a 390 by 844 phone. In the running app every top-level body is on screen on arrival: the camera at 415.8 AU on 390x844, 269.0 on 1000x1400 and 192.1 on 1600x1000. Control: the ceiling back at 200 fails "leaves the outermost ring clear of the frame edge at every scale and window shape". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
869635bec1 |
Give a star no survey measured no luminosity, so its planets get no temperature from a stand-in
luminosityOf derived a luminosity from any magnitude, including the stand-in the ETL writes for the 309 stars with neither a V nor a G. starSurfaceOf already refused it for the radius; the card, the system view's planet appearances and the body pages did not. The 265 archive hosts among them came out at a median 33 L☉: KMT-2016-BLG-1107L, a 0.087 M☉ star, at 36.8, and OGLE-2005-BLG-390L b, published at about 50 K, read 388 K and a sub-Neptune. Their cards printed "Magnitude: Not measured" beside a luminosity derived from that magnitude. The guard now sits in luminosityOf, which every caller goes through, so the one in starSurfaceOf is gone. The Sun keeps its 1 whatever band it is filed under. Measured on the shipped catalogue: of the 275 planets on those 265 hosts, 268 had an equilibrium temperature and 0 now do; before the archive stars were added they had no host, and so none either. Controls: without the guard, "has none from a magnitude no survey measured, and gives its planets no temperature from it" fails (with the radius test beside it, 2 of 777); without the Sun's exemption, "is 1 for the Sun, whatever its magnitude is filed under" fails (1 of 777). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8c4f1c11c9 |
Build a body still waiting for its surface with a null map, so three stops warning on each one
Since
|
||
|
SenrokaiandClaude Opus 5.5
|
036af5f02d |
Test what the drawn solar system claims at far dates and on Saturn's ring
Three claims had no test that fails without them: - Standish's rates for a, e and i. The frozen Horizons vectors run from 1950 to 2100, where dropping them moves a planet at most 0.036 degrees (Saturn in 2100), inside every ceiling; the clock runs to AD 3000, and the long span is what those rates are for. Two vectors from Horizons (DE441) for 3000-01-01 now join the table: the Earth-Moon barycentre, 0.005 degrees out (0.129 without the rates), and Saturn's, 0.065 (0.412). - A planet's orbit line turned each tick with its node and periapsis: only the Moon's and Pluto's were tested. Mars must stay on its own line 730 000 days before J2000; on a line left at J2000 it is 3.3 million km from it at AD 1. - Saturn's ring lit and drawn from both faces, which dc20acc's title claims and the tests, reading only its geometry and picking through its front face, never checked. Controls: the three rates dropped fails "puts earth within 0.02 degrees of Horizons on JD 2816787.5" (and Saturn's); the top-level line left unturned fails "turns a planet's drawn orbit with its node"; an unlit front-face-only material fails "is lit, and seen from either face". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |